Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarvinStinson

A better approach, IMO, would be to hold judges, whose rulings are overturned, to much tighter scrutiny, and level hefty penalties for abuse.
At minimum, a three strikes rule, where if overturned 3 times by a higher court, they’re out, done being a judge, anywhere.


11 posted on 09/12/2019 11:04:27 AM PDT by Fireone (Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fireone
A better approach, IMO, would be to hold judges, whose rulings are overturned, to much tighter scrutiny, and level hefty penalties for abuse. At minimum, a three strikes rule, where if overturned 3 times by a higher court, they’re out, done being a judge, anywhere.

Great ideas!

25 posted on 09/12/2019 11:17:29 AM PDT by Rapscallion (If they are not for Trump, they are against him. Fire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Fireone

> if overturned 3 times by a higher court, they’re out, done being a judge, anywhere.

Require an impeachment vote in the House - no voice votes allowed.


37 posted on 09/12/2019 11:56:41 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson