Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fireone
A better approach, IMO, would be to hold judges, whose rulings are overturned, to much tighter scrutiny, and level hefty penalties for abuse. At minimum, a three strikes rule, where if overturned 3 times by a higher court, they’re out, done being a judge, anywhere.

Great ideas!

25 posted on 09/12/2019 11:17:29 AM PDT by Rapscallion (If they are not for Trump, they are against him. Fire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Rapscallion

Another suggest for legislation would make it mandatory that nationwide injunctions be given in person to the Senate Judiciary committee who then get to ask questions of the judge. The committee gets the authority to grant a stay until SCOTUS rules on the merits.


26 posted on 09/12/2019 11:31:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson