Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google faces a new antitrust probe by 50 attorneys general
CNBC ^ | Lauren Feiner

Posted on 09/09/2019 12:32:34 PM PDT by BeauBo

Texas will lead a joint state investigation into Google over antitrust concerns, state Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Monday. The news follows the announcement of a joint state Facebook probe led by the attorney general of New York. Google is also reportedly facing an antitrust probe from the U.S. Department of Justice...

The bipartisan probe includes attorneys general from 48 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. California and Alabama are not involved in the probe...

Antitrust, compared to privacy and consumer protection concerns, poses a more direct threat to these companies’ business models. If the federal or state probes find evidence of anti-competitive behavior at Google, for example, it could be compelled to make its algorithms friendlier to rivals even if it eats at its own profits. It could also be forced to spin off entire business units like YouTube.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: antitrust; google
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2019 12:32:34 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Figures about California.


2 posted on 09/09/2019 12:33:24 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Good luck with it, AGs. You’re going nowhere.


3 posted on 09/09/2019 12:36:54 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Forcing business units like YouTube does not mean that the bias would stop. The bias would continue at the individual units, since the ownership and management and employees would likely not change.


4 posted on 09/09/2019 12:38:58 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
Probe em, probe em good!!!


5 posted on 09/09/2019 12:39:27 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

I will say that I would be perfectly happy if Google were completely destroyed. More importantly, it is the Executive Management that needs to be completely reamed out and destroyed. Someone who worships only money is not someone we need running around. JMO


6 posted on 09/09/2019 12:40:35 PM PDT by txnativegop (The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

My limited understanding of GOOGLE is this.

When you do a google search, google collects your ISP address.

When you make repeated searches from that ISP address, Google manipulates the search results so the results comport with what you have been previously searching for.

So my point is this.

Why can’t the Feds force Google to stop collecting ISP address information?

If Google has no information about a person’s prior searches, Google would not be able to manipulate the search results.


7 posted on 09/09/2019 12:40:41 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

YUGE

campaign donations about to happen.


8 posted on 09/09/2019 12:52:23 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Oh.
So you are saying that evidence suppression is a fait accompli?


9 posted on 09/09/2019 12:54:23 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

Since most internet activity is done over the airwaves by smart-phones why doesn’t the FCC have a say in all of this?


10 posted on 09/09/2019 12:57:07 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

That’s also true of YouTube, which is owned by Google.

If you search for content on one household device, you’ll see related content when you open YouTube on another household device.

Typically, all household devices are seen as the same public IP address by other internet entities. (all your devices “hide” behind the same router/modem)


11 posted on 09/09/2019 1:02:21 PM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

They’ll show these state AGs who had the real power, especially when they ty to run for re-election...


12 posted on 09/09/2019 1:03:16 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

That makes too much sense and is probably too easy to do>

Additionally, there go the surveillance operations on American citizens.


13 posted on 09/09/2019 1:07:45 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

“Google faces a new antitrust probe by 50 attorneys general”

What about the other seven?


14 posted on 09/09/2019 1:10:01 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Google may have to give up both YouTube and their Android/Fuchsia divisions if we do have a Federal antitrust probe. And it may force Facebook to sell off WhatsApp and Instagram.


15 posted on 09/09/2019 1:31:36 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
And it may force Facebook to sell off WhatsApp and Instagram.

That's too bad.

16 posted on 09/09/2019 1:51:51 PM PDT by BipolarBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

With leftists/anarchists/demonkkkRATs/commies.fascists, it is a fact.


17 posted on 09/09/2019 2:22:33 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

We can only hope so.


18 posted on 09/09/2019 2:23:16 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

But they do not worship only money: They worship leftist, fascistic, political power, too.

They are not in the slightest neutral. The mantra that, All they care about is money, is false.


19 posted on 09/09/2019 2:53:01 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

If Google has no information about a person’s prior searches, Google would not be able to manipulate the search results.


so don’t use google search engine then ...simple

why do we even need this antitrust stuff when they offer a free service and there are other options out there also for free?

I remember when nobody heard of google and they would pay web masters to put their search engine boxes on their page for each search....that is how they got their foot in the door versus the giant YAHOO at the time

why do we even need the government involved? Why do we want to punish a company that took a risk and made good business decisions over the years to get where they are today?


20 posted on 09/09/2019 3:15:09 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson