Posted on 09/04/2019 11:22:23 AM PDT by mplc51
Communist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY) on Wednesday lectured Congressman Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) on how to handle firearms.
Dan Crenshaw served as a Navy SEAL for 10 years including 5 tours of duty in the Middle East and South Korea.
Crenshaw lost his right eye in 2012 after an IED detonated near him in Afghanistan.
But the 29-year-old bartender knows more about firearms and the 2nd Amendment than Crenshaw.
Crenshaw defended the 2nd Amendment on Tuesday after yet another story about an armed woman who defended herself from five men who tried to rob her.
Correct.
She must be defeated at the ballot box.
Somehow.
Only confirming the moronic douche bag that she is.
And until those who kiss her @$$ start to go against her and take her to the woodshed. She will continue to spout lies, deceit and her self-importance even thought she is a complete total jerk!!!!
Yes. Did you compose this? Too many words for a hat. Maybe in small print on a t-shirt.
AOC is a dangerous combination of ignorance and arrogance. I’ve of her before: “Often mistaken, but never in doubt.”.
She’s also very typical of the “snowflake” generation, where she gets to have her own truth, regardless of objective facts. And the rest of society is wrong (and worse) if they don’t accommodate HER reality.
And drug testing. Congress should be subject to random drug testing.
Common factor: they think they "deserve" Prince Charming, and are upset that the ones who might want to ask her out are not up to her standards, and the ones that would be up to her standards have no interest in asking her out.
ten bucks says he'd be a better bartender than her too
Post the rest. The blog doesn’t own the words.
*****
Situations like this story are why we protect the 2nd Amendment.
Side note: With universal background checks, I wouldn’t be able to let my friends borrow my handgun when they travel alone like this. We would make felons out of people just for defending themselves. https://t.co/x60mdd1WW1
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) September 4, 2019
AOC dropped in as if she’s the expert and lectured Crenshaw.
You are a member of Congress. Why are you “lending” guns to people unsupervised who can’t pass a basic background check?
The people you’re giving a gun to have likely abused their spouse or have a violent criminal record, & you may not know it.
Why on earth would you do that? https://t.co/TQFjcLQebO
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 4, 2019
Update: Crenshaw responded to AOC Wednesday afternoon and crushed her.
Just so I’m clear: you think my friends are domestic abusers/criminals? Seriously that’s your argument? That they can’t pass a background check?
Wrong. People lend guns to friends, esp if they don’t own a gun, for self-defense and hunting purposes.
This is America outside NYC. https://t.co/wkWPhfi0JB
— Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) September 4, 2019
If you had really serious background checks for members of Congress, their staff and some consultants, you’d need more jails for traitors, crooks, and crackheads.
I’ve gotten several congressional staffers fired for being security risks (one guy worked for three congressmen/Senator Kerry) and was fired for lying about his background by two of them, and it wasn’t Kerry who covered up this guy’s treason and his work for him.
If you read Trevor Loudon’s major study entitled “The Enemies Within: Communists, Marxists, Progressives in the US Congress”, 2013-15 edition (go to www.keywiki.org for information on how to order it).
You’ll find a quote on the cover or just inside that said “Most congresspeople couldn’t pass a security check”.
It’s worst now than almost any other period except when the Communist Party had its greatest number of members/supporters elected in the classes of 1964-72 - Abzug, Conyers, Rangel, the Burtons, Kastenmeier, later Hayes and Crockett, Waters, Hugh DeLacey, Don Edwards, Ted Kennedy and Tom Harkin, etc).
We need to totally overhaul our internal security systems, which would, as a consequence, throw out scores of Democrats in both the House and Senate immediately.
Good question....
of course you left out the part a judge actually decides not a brutal gorilla of a man if a red flag law should be enforced...
I can't remember the last time a civilian can order the police to do anything...
The expression, “better to keep one’s mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt” comes to mind.
She’s projecting that most of her friends are abusive criminals.
We live in a society where:
Homosexuals lecture us on morals,
Transsexuals lecture us on human biology,
Baby killers lecture us on human rights,
and Socialists lecture us on economics!
I did a little editing, and FReepers did the rest!
Since the gorilla has a reasonable chance of getting shot if he tries to beat the soon to-be-ex-wife and her daughters to a bloody pulp...
...well, he is a gorilla, it's what they do, and she is a mother grizzly protecting her cubs.
Still I'll make a concession:
Should a massive brutal gorilla of a man be allowed to use Red Flag laws to anonymously force the police to disarm his petite wife, who just filed for divorce because he was injuring her and her children?
Yes?
No?
This is America outside NYC. We have guns and garbage disposals!
Fly over country is a foreign country to these pukes.
Correction:
It was transvestites lecture us on human biology,
Foreign and vastly inferior.
Unlike Venezuela, North Korea or Cuba...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.