Posted on 08/30/2019 12:16:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Beijing keeps signaling that it has no appetite for compromise with the people of Hong Kong, let alone adhere to the agreement made for its transfer to China in 1997. As protests enter the fourth month, touched off by an extradition bill that the government refuses to fully withdraw, police have seized pro-democracy leaders in an attempt to silence the dissent. Two leaders of the 2014 Umbrella Movement were charged with illegal protests:
Hong Kong authorities have made their highest-profile arrests, detaining three well-known activists as they clampdown on a wave of unrest in the city. More here: https://t.co/1UxXII9M5I pic.twitter.com/l1kwks09fE
— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) August 30, 2019
Authorities widened a crackdown on the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong with the arrests of prominent activists, underscoring Beijing’s growing intolerance of sustained protests that have convulsed the Chinese territory and revived calls for universal suffrage.
Joshua Wong and Agnes Chow, who rose to eminence as the student leaders of pro-democracy demonstrations in 2014, were detained Friday, ahead of what is expected to be a tense weekend in the city. Authorities banned a march planned for Saturday, and warned they would use force and possibly arrest those who defy the order.
Police said Wong and Chow face charges of participating in an unauthorized assembly and inciting others to participate in an unapproved assembly, while Wong faces an additional charge of organizing an unapproved assembly, in relation to a June 21 protest at police headquarters. Both were released on bail Friday. …
The sweep came ahead of a sensitive political anniversary in the semiautonomous Chinese territory. This Saturday marks five years since Beijing announced an electoral-reform plan that denied Hong Kong free elections — a decision that triggered 79 days of pro-democracy protests.
The police department’s PR flack later claimed that the arrests of the two were “not correlated” to the anniversary. That seems doubtful, needless to say. Hong Kong likely got orders from Beijing not to allow protesters to highlight the success of the Umbrella Movement five years ago by prominently featuring Wong and Chow in demonstrations, or perhaps just to warn the pair what would happen if they try.
Just how far China will go to shut down these demonstrations is not yet known. However, Reuters reports that Beijing rejected any negotiation with protesters early on when the demonstrations might have been contained. Chief executive Carrie Lam told her bosses that withdrawing the extradition bill along with four other reforms demanded by the protesters would resolve the situation, but Beijing refused to bend on any of them:
EXCLUSIVE: China rejected a formal submission made by the Hong Kong government to withdraw an extradition bill that has sparked months of protests in the city: sources. More here: https://t.co/d9d9FkEFxi pic.twitter.com/17uposDg6r
— Reuters Top News (@Reuters) August 30, 2019
The Chinese central government rejected Lam’s proposal to withdraw the extradition bill and ordered her not to yield to any of the protesters’ other demands at that time, three individuals with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters. …
In addition to the withdrawal of the extradition bill, the other demands analyzed in the report were: an independent inquiry into the protests; fully democratic elections; dropping of the term “riot” in describing protests; and dropping charges against those arrested so far.
The withdrawal of the bill and an independent inquiry were seen to be the most feasible politically, according to a senior government official in the Hong Kong administration, who spoke on condition of anonymity. He said the move was envisioned as helping pacify some of the more moderate protesters who have been angered by Lam’s silence. …
Another of the three individuals, who has close ties with senior officials in Hong Kong and also declined to be identified, confirmed the Hong Kong government had submitted the report.
“They said no” to all five demands, said the source. “The situation is far more complicated than most people realize.”
Reuters calls this “concrete evidence” of Beijing’s control of Lam, as well as their intent to violate the terms of the 1997 transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong. Those have both been obvious for some time anyway, but this does show just how little room Beijing allows for meaningful compromise. Withdrawing the extradition bill and allowing an inquiry into police action would have cost Beijing nothing. They could have reintroduced the bill later, perhaps in a quieter form, and Beijing would have been able to control the inquiry themselves anyway, or at least its reporting capabilities. Instead, Beijing chose a showdown, and now they appear to be going out of their way to make it a violent showdown.
It’s not all that complicated. Xi Jinping sees Hong Kong’s success and autonomy as threats to his cult of personality, and he’s going to make an example out of those who stand up to him. He’s a tyrannical thug with a highly developed bureaucratic base and a whooooole lotta guns. History is replete with such examples, especially in communist/fascist countries with leaders who have delusions of godhood. It never ends well for them, even if the end takes a long time to arrive.
They probably got banned from Facebook and twitter right before the arrest.
and Trumps the problem according to Libs! Well corporate America wait until China nationalizes your investment in Chinese ventures. Think I'm kidding, China will blame the problem on the USA partner and take their share. Hard lesson for some to learn, but never trust a Commie!
Yep, that about sums it up.
More arrests to come—a lot more. They will be in Prison factories soon making toys for American Christmas.
What does “pro-democracy” mean in this context.
All or orchestrated from the beginning by Chinese MsS, and long planned in advance.
China wants to take over the Honk Kong dollar, so they have agents within the protesters starting things.
This is equivalent to Hitler’s rhetoric on Austrian Anschluss
SOP. Japanese Americans were interned 6 months after Pearl Harbor. On December 8th the FBI arrested the leaders of the Japanese American community.
RE: What does “pro-democracy” mean in this context.
For China not to reneged on its promise to give Hong Kong its autonomy for 50 years when she took over in 1997.
Which also means that HK handles its own criminal justice system and not extradite people in its territory to China who the Chicoms deem to be criminals.
This also means that Bejing will bring in enforcement
from other parts of the country who have no connection
to the Hk citizens. That is the next step.
I hope Xi realizes this will not make Trump any more
amenable to a trade deal. It’s not the Obama Regime
he’s dealing with.
[History is replete with such examples, especially in communist/fascist countries with leaders who have delusions of godhood. It never ends well for them, even if the end takes a long time to arrive.]
[I hope Xi realizes this will not make Trump any more
amenable to a trade deal. It’s not the Obama Regime
he’s dealing with.]
Well, that’s the difference between Obama and Trump.
Trump may want a deal but he doesn’t want it if it
means he screws the country. Obama only cared about
his image anyway, it wasn’t his money.
It means the entire Legislative Council is elected. Currently a minority is elected and the majority appointed by Beijing puppet committees.
It also means Beijing cannot simply disqualify candidates. These two kudos were both elected to the legislature and Beijing simply said they are disqualified.
This is them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.