Upon completing our investigation, pursuant to Section 4(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978, the OIG provided a copy of its factual findings to the Department for a prosecutorial decision regarding Comey's conduct. See 5 U.S.C.A. App. 3 § 4(d) (2016). After reviewing the matter, the Department declined prosecution. Thereafter, we prepared this report to consider whether Comey’s actions violated Department or FBI policy, or the terms of Comey’s FBI Employment Agreement. As described in this report, we conclude that Comey’s retention, handling, and dissemination of certain Memos violated Department and FBI policies, and his FBI Employment Agreement.4
While just about everyone else would have been brought up on charges in this situation, I'm of the opinion...still, that the FISA abuse is the bigger fish to fry and that is where Barr and Durham better be laying the groundwork for indictments over this failed coup attempt.
The memo's that Comey took home (as an "insurance policy" if he were to be fired) were not classified by Comey at the time (which many should have been).
The memo's that Comey DID classify above confidential, he left in the FBI office.
Comey leaks those unclassified documents he took home, or parts of them.
The FBI then does a review ex post facto and determines that what Comey took home was not classified above confidential.
Guess who the 4 FBI officials were that reviewed the documents to determine classification status...
Assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division Bill Priestap, FBI general counsel James Baker, Peter Strzok and Lisa Paige.
So his friends and allies in the coup attempt where the ones who "determined" that the 4 memo's Comey took home (& leaked) where not to be classified above confidential.
Stunning.
No one is going to be brought up on charges until the case is so slam-dunk that a jury of 12, partially selected by a billion dollar (funded by Soros, so maybe muti-billion dollar) Dream Team of defense lawyers, will absolutely convict...all 12 of them withou one single exception.
Why so high a bar? Because if you indict and bring charges, and the perp is let off - even on a technicality, let alone by Left-Wing jury nullification (remember O.J.?), then we are FAR worse off then if charges are never brought. Them the likes Comey and all the others are EXONERATED and they become completely justified in their actions.
You think no indictments are bad. Try exoneration of their actions on for size. You can’t just indict. You MUST win convictions or you are far worse off then when you started.