Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

If those two cameras were broken, and known to be broken prior to Epstein being placed in that cell, especially after he had recently been on suicide watch, then I’d have to say that he was placed in that cell deliberately to off him. He never should have been placed in a cell where the cameras outside had malfunctioned. Was there a central monitoring system? When did these cameras go down? Did they go down prior to his being placed there, or after? If they went down prior to, that info should have been logged in a log book that is usually kept by whoever is responsible for monitoring the cameras, and a work order submitted for those cameras to be fixed. You don’t put a high profile inmate like Epstein in a cell where there is no camera coverage...period. What has gone on is total bullshit, plain and simple.


17 posted on 08/29/2019 9:23:57 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th

You make some very good points. I once worked in a building that had cameras everywhere. And there was a guard whose only job was to watch the monitors.

Yet we have two broken cameras in this case. I would think that two blank monitors would be hard to miss.


24 posted on 08/29/2019 9:37:28 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson