Judge rules 130-year law against encouraging illegal immigrants is unconstitutional

Conservative Review ^ | 08/23/2019 | Daniel Horowitz

[Lurkinanloomin]

That judge needs to be impeached.

[House Atreides]

This Clinton judge’s sister is the CEO of La Raza and another sister is on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Thanks a lot ‘RATS!

[Gay State Conservative]

OK...then call it "conspiracy". Is it evil for me to hope that a tsunami wipes out Osama Obama's new beachfront mansion with him in it? It would be a fitting payback for all the damage he's done to this country.

I'm assuming that he appointed this pig fornicating Federal judge.

[Nuc 1.1]

Ignore this ruling. It is anti-American nonsense. Judges say we cannot enforce our laws or our borders. What BS. Some federal judges like this one are in open rebellion. Past time to hold them accountable.

[bk1000]

[CivilWarBrewing]

[Reno89519]

So, by extension, I could encourage anyone to commit a crime, then claim first amendment protection? Or, the young woman that encouraged her boyfriend to kill himself, now she should be freed and conviction reversed?

[SkyDancer]

But the Constitution does have it in there you can’t be here illegally.

[virgil]

I’d say that judge has a conflict of interest.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Mexicans ruling for Mexicans and Mexico in American courts, just disgusting.

[Openurmind]

I was indeed there, I told him to do it, But the 1st says I am not an accessory.

Very good point.

[butlerweave]

How long did it take them to find this 130-year old law ? LOL

[simpson96]

The judge's sis...

[dljordan]

There you go.

Judge Carlos Murguia of the U.S. District Court

How did this happen?

[Do_Tar]

Aren’t the libs always screaming about “precedent”?

[antidemoncrat]

“Judge Carlos Murguia of the U.S. District Court of Kansas”

An amigo judge taking the side of illegal aliens..color me shocked.

[Spacetrucker]

I see what you did there ... and I approve.

[Regulator]

Next up, La Raza rules that the United Estates has no right to a border...with Mexico.

This is all predictable. Once the Mexican gangsters got a critical mass of people here, they would set out to tear down the laws of the country.

Any honest judge would have recused himself, but clearly this was a set up - they brought the case in his Circuit and the insiders scheduled him.

[Amendment10]

”… that 8 U.S.C. §1324, the law prohibiting someone from “encouraging” or “inducing” illegal immigration, is an unconstitutional infringement upon the First Amendment."

The referenced law applies to “persons.”

8 U.S. Code § 1324. Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

It is important to note persons, opposed to citizens, because constitutionally enumerated protections do not protect non-citizens imo.

So if an illegal alien encourages other illegal aliens, then they are not protected by 1st Amendment-protected free speech imo, and are therefore breaking the law.

Corrections, insights welcome.

Remember in November 2020!

MAGA! Now KAG! (Keep America Great!)