Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US cruise missile test will start a new arms race, says China
South China Morning Post (Hong Kong) ^ | August 20, 2019 | Lee Jeong-ho

Posted on 08/20/2019 8:54:42 AM PDT by BeauBo

The United States withdrew from the INF Treaty this month, accusing Moscow of having broken the agreement by developing its nuclear-capable SSC-8 missiles – with an estimated range of 2,600km – and placing some in western Russia.

Washington is also believed to be preparing for another test in November of an intermediate-range ballistic missile that it wants to deploy in the Asia-Pacific region, according to Reuters on Tuesday. This could signal an escalation of tension in the coming months.

Earlier this month, US Defence Secretary Mark Esper expressed a wish to station intermediate-range missiles in the Pacific region within months. His country’s national security adviser John Bolton has also suggested that the missiles could be deployed in Japan and South Korea.

China has vowed to take unspecified countermeasures if the US deploys ground-based missiles in South Korea or Japan. Russia has also said it would respond if they were deployed.

(Excerpt) Read more at scmp.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; inf; missile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
"Zhang Baohui, director of Lingnan University’s Centre for Asian Pacific Studies in Hong Kong, said: “The US currently has no intermediate-range missiles due to the constraints of the INF, so if it wants to acquire those capabilities after the withdrawal from the treaty, new missiles will have to be developed and tested. “The new cruise missile, as well as new ballistic missiles with ranges longer than 500km, is intended to increase US deterrence against its main competitors. Beijing certainly does not want to see this development, but it is not a real game-changer, because the US has always based its long-range offensive capabilities on air power, not missile forces.”

Zhang noted that Beijing had rejected pressure from the US to join a new INF treaty. “Missile capability forms the backbone of China’s deterrence and offers some kind of balance against US air power in the Pacific,” he said. Zhao Tong, a fellow in Carnegie’s Nuclear Policy Programme at the Carnegie-Tsinghua Centre for Global Policy in Beijing, said: “The US feels it can no longer sit on its hands and watch Russia developing such capabilities and China building more of these weapons. It reflects a clear arms-race mentality: one’s military build-up is guided not by clear strategy but by a desire to avoid being left behind.

“From the US perspective, to deploy such missiles in Asia would at least force China to take massive measures to protect its military targets from a possible US threat – a cost-imposition strategy to distract and delay China’s build-up of offensive military capabilities.”

Beijing might flex its muscles in response, Adam Ni, a China researcher at Sydney’s Macquarie University, said. “China sees possible new US missile deployments to its doorstep as very provocative and dangerous,” he said. “It may decide to counter new US missiles by developing and deploying more missiles and increasing their lethality.”"

1 posted on 08/20/2019 8:54:42 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
They've been testing missiles in this range class, so our testing one starts a new arms race? Got it.
2 posted on 08/20/2019 8:56:14 AM PDT by null and void (Heaven has an impenetrable wall, and a welcoming gate for those qualified, Hell is wide open.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

China started a “fake island” race.

Those would be perfect targets for cruise missiles, by the way.


3 posted on 08/20/2019 8:57:14 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

How about China controlling their client in North Korea?

We have to test our Cruise Missiles because North Korea is testing THEIR missiles.

They started the arms race, not us.


4 posted on 08/20/2019 8:57:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
So many good testing sites in the area!


5 posted on 08/20/2019 8:58:20 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
They've been testing missiles in this range class, so our testing one starts a new arms race? Got it.

Right. It's not a 'race' until there's more than one participant.

6 posted on 08/20/2019 8:58:28 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“So many good testing sites in the area!” (South China Sea)

These missiles could make that area unsafe for Chinese Military operations (Area Denial), if the local countries were armed with them.


7 posted on 08/20/2019 9:02:44 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
The MK-41 launcher was used. Looks like it fits nicely into standard shipping container size for easy portability (and smuggling into range).

The top layer of a cargo ship might suddenly open and fire a big salvo.


8 posted on 08/20/2019 9:15:49 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

I wonder China realizes what a comical nation it looks like at times.

I thought the Asian culture was focused on saving face.

China looks the fool so many times these days.


9 posted on 08/20/2019 9:20:48 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“China looks the fool so many times these days.”

Unfortunately, they already have their running dog lackeys in the Democratic Party working to zero out funding for these weapons in the House budget.


10 posted on 08/20/2019 9:29:25 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

The amazing thing is that no one is telling the Chinese central committee that its a bad idea to piss off their best customer and long time friend.

The arrogance of the chinese in this is just amazing.


11 posted on 08/20/2019 9:31:08 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Don’t need a new one. The old one is alive and well.


12 posted on 08/20/2019 9:36:15 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

They have the “mandate of heaven” barbarians should know there place!


13 posted on 08/20/2019 9:37:59 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Well IMHO, McArthur should have been left to continue his advance into China. My point being China is the USA’s clear and present danger. Russia hasn’t been for 30 years. What the hell Nixon was thinking opening the window to them I don’t know, but likely it was all Kissinger whispering in his ear.


14 posted on 08/20/2019 9:52:04 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Exactly. If China doesn’t want this then they need to get the Norks under control.


15 posted on 08/20/2019 10:00:16 AM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Good, because China will lose an arms race, and perhaps it will cause them to collapse just like the Soviets did.


16 posted on 08/20/2019 10:01:31 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Good, because China will lose an arms race, and perhaps it will cause them to collapse just like the Soviets did.

I wonder how long they’ll believe their keeping up with the technology they’ve stolen thus far?


17 posted on 08/20/2019 10:19:54 AM PDT by heshtesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Only if China can Steal them


18 posted on 08/20/2019 10:22:48 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Of course they do.

They’re on the same team.

But then the folks in the House don’t look any smarter either.


19 posted on 08/20/2019 10:48:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

FTA: “Esper expressed a wish to station intermediate-range missiles in the Pacific region within months”
Why we keep announcing our intentions I don’t know, unless there is some deception involved. I’ve hoped that all that theft of intellectual property involved some sort of deception; something seemingly innocuous that gums up the works for them when they try to put it to use.


20 posted on 08/20/2019 11:12:40 AM PDT by Theophilous Meatyard III
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson