Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOD Tests Intermediate-Range Cruise Missile
Air Force Magazine ^ | 19 Aug 2019 | BRIAN EVERSTINE

Posted on 08/20/2019 4:54:45 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

This story was updated on Aug. 19 at 1:23 p.m. EST to include video of the test.

The Defense Department on Aug. 18 conducted a test of an intermediate-range, ground-based cruise missile, about two weeks after the withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

A mobile launcher fired the conventionally configured cruise missile at San Nicolas Island, Calif., and it accurately “impacted its target” more than 500 kilometers away, according to a Pentagon statement.

“Data collected and lessons learned from this test will inform the Department of Defense’s development of future intermediate-range capabilities,” the statement reads.

The statement alludes to the fact that the cruise missile, while currently configured for a conventional payload, could carry a nuclear one. The Trump Administration last year announced its plans to pull out of the treaty, citing Russia’s long disregard for it and development of an intermediate range cruise missile that violates its parameters. The process for pulling out of the treaty began in February, and the US military has been developing new missiles.

“What we’ve been working on over the past several months is some research and development work for what could become a non-INF-compliant weapon system, should we get to [that] point, so we’ve postured ourselves for this possibility that we may find ourselves at a point in the near future where we’re not obligated by the INF Treaty,” Vice Adm. Dave Kriete, deputy commander of US Strategic Command, told reporters July 31. “That’s just prudent military planning.”

The treaty, which went into effect in 1987, banned all land-based cruise and ballistic missiles, either nuclear or conventional, that could strike targets between 500 and 5,500 kilometers away.

“The United States will not remain party to a treaty that is deliberately violated by Russia,” the State Department said Aug. 2 in announcing the withdrawal. “Russia’s noncompliance under the treaty jeopardizes US supreme interests as Russia’s development and fielding of a treaty-violating missile system represents a direct threat to the United States and our allies and partners.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dod; glcm; inf; usaf
I remember when we got rid of most of our GLCMs (Ground-Launched Cruise Missiles) back in the late 80s due to Pres Reagan and Mikail Gorbochev signing the INF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty). I went to Italy in 1991 and we "raided" the unfinished GLCM base at Comiso, Italy for stuff since the INF had us close the base, even though we never formally opened it.
1 posted on 08/20/2019 4:54:45 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I should mention the Pershing II missiles as well, that were manned by the US Army. These were slated for many European bases also, and were withdrawn due to the INF Treaty.


2 posted on 08/20/2019 4:56:09 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The media is after us. Trump's just in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

INF treaty and Chinese détente. What short sighted stupidity that was. Now CHina is more powerful than RUssia and not hampered by an arms treaty.

GOlly. what genius thought of that! Oh, yes, that KGB mole Kissinger identified by that Romanian defector...

BEsides, what a stupid move to reveal your arms to an enemy. Peace you get when the robber knows not how well armed the owner of the house is, just that he is well armed. Good grief. Not to mention that arms control means you admit to be a regular hunter predator with a set limit on weaponry to do the hunting with. Why would we admit guilt as managed like by game warden? We are into self defense and undefined armament, not police predatorial behavior!

Thank the globalist Bushes for this idiocy concept of a global cop in a border less world.


3 posted on 08/20/2019 5:02:21 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Actually, time is the problem

Time has passed during which China has changed and prospered.

Russia has shrunk from the USSR and can’t seem to get it together to prosper


4 posted on 08/20/2019 5:07:13 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

Yet Trump is heading us in the right direction. First, he shut down the INF. It is no more.

Second, he follows up with new GLCM deployments, and these GLCMs are far advanced compared to what we had in the 1980s.

Third, he is working to get China back into a better relationship with the USA, not by offering them concessions, but with the hard whip of tariffs and trade agreements.


5 posted on 08/20/2019 5:22:37 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The media is after us. Trump's just in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

We’ve had Tomahawk cruise missiles deployed on ships for a long time. All they had to do was set them up to be launchable from a truck. Or lengthen the MLRS launcher pack a bit.


6 posted on 08/20/2019 5:35:57 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Selling Tomahawks to Taiwan would complicate Chinese invasion plans.


7 posted on 08/20/2019 5:44:56 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

The BGM-109 Gryphon was the US Air Force version of the Navy’s Tomahawk, yes.

The GLCM they tested recently is a far more advanced model.


8 posted on 08/20/2019 6:42:54 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The media is after us. Trump's just in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

“Selling Tomahawks to Taiwan would complicate Chinese invasion plans.”

Add a couple of old Ohio Class subs with full nuclear payloads to the mix.


9 posted on 08/20/2019 6:57:35 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Trump is President and CEO of America, Inc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson