Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force completes A-10 re-winging to keep iconic aircraft flying into 2030s
The Washington Times ^ | August 13, 2019 | Douglas Ernst

Posted on 08/13/2019 2:56:43 PM PDT by jazusamo

The iconic A-10 Thunderbolt II will be flying into the late 2030s thanks to a re-winging project completed by the U.S. Air Force.

Air Force Materiel Command said in a press release on Monday that 162 A-10s received new wings thanks to a $1.1 billion project that began in 2011.

The contract, awarded to Boeing in 2007, required the creation of new parts for the plane’s fuselage.

“At the end of the program, making sure we had all the pieces and parts that we needed to make that happen required a really significant team effort,” said Stephen Zaiser, director of the 571st, Air Force Times reported Tuesday...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: a10; cas; defensespending; rewinging; trumpdod; usaf; usairforce; warthogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: jazusamo
In Viet Nam the equivalent of the A-10 was the A-1 Sky Raider. Like the Warthog, the A-1 was low and slow and ground troops and downed F-4 and F-105 pilots loved it because it could loiter for extended periods of time, carry incredible loads of ordinance and take severe punishment. The only reason the USAF brass wanted to retire it was because they were getting close to retirement and were trying to lock in cushy defense industry lobbying employment to really supplement their golden years.
41 posted on 08/13/2019 4:04:07 PM PDT by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon
Stealth is not really useful because a CAS aircraft which is doing its job is pretty easily detected by the Mk I Eyeball.

Stealth is designed to penetrate air defenses. On a battle field a close air support stealth doesn't give you sh*t the enemy can see you. I would rather have a plane that can take punishment and kick their ASSES!

42 posted on 08/13/2019 4:23:31 PM PDT by painter ( Isaiah: �Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

The go-fast boys in the USAF have always hated the A-10.

CC


43 posted on 08/13/2019 4:25:18 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wildcard_redneck

“...the airframe itself can easily last another 30 years with updates to the electronic hardware, software, and engines.” [wildcard_redneck, post 33]

The airframe might last, but the avionics are already obsolescent. And they cannot be upgraded. Digital MIL STD bus systems are on all recent combat aircraft; the few subsystems on the A-10 were stand-alone. Remaking the entire aircraft would be needed, which would cost more than a new design.

Communications systems are incompatible with the new networked systems concept. It isn’t that new, but it’s been taking extra-long to implement because of resistance from people who don’t understand it. And it isn’t inexpensive either, which rubs Americans the wrong way: we want national defense but still believe it can be done on the cheap.


44 posted on 08/13/2019 4:47:43 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Usually see a pair of A-10s from MANG at Martin’s (home of the B-26) flying in formation when we’re golfing on Wednesdays.

On the 4th of July, they were putting on a show. Lower than usual, doing wing overs and rolls and other cool things. Must have gotten permission to show the taxpayers what they were paying for.

My MIL asked me if they were drones. “I’ve never seen a drone.”

No, Ma, they’re not drones. Now make me a pie.


45 posted on 08/13/2019 4:59:28 PM PDT by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“It would seem to me that at a cost of another billion or so, the rest of the fleet could be upgraded.”

Probably a lot less. Jigs & fixtures are in the initial price, so your only looking at additional material plus some marginal labor.


46 posted on 08/13/2019 5:08:26 PM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn; Hieronymus

“...Speed is the opposite of loiter time...” [Hieronymus, post 29]

“...best attack plane ever...” [Steve Van Doorn, post 31]

Actual results in Afghanistan do not support Steve’s assertion.

The A-10 performed the smallest percentage of close support sorties, of all US combat aircraft in theater. It was also the slowest, the least responsive, and the least effective all-weather platform. This transpired in part because there were not that many sent into action, compared to F-18, F-15, and F-16.

The B-52H was second-best, and the B-1B came out best. Their loiter times outdid all the smaller machines by several multiples. Same for their weapons loadouts, in terms of weight & numbers of individual munitions.

The B-1B negated Hieronymus’ assertion, because of its variable-geometry wings. With wings swept full forward, it could loiter at relatively low airspeeds well away from immediate engagement spots, but when called on, the wings could be swept all the way aft and the machine would dash to the vicinity of the ground unit requesting support, in a very short time.

Both the B-52 and the B-1 outmatched the A-10 in flexibility, in part because of their crew size. Sufficient warm bodies to reprogram target data as needed, navigate, dodge threats, and put more munitions down on target.

The A-10 was severely limited because the pilot had to do it all. And its engagement capabilities were severely limited at night and in bad weather. The latter might be improved a little by adding enhanced vision systems, but nothing can be done to add crewmembers.


47 posted on 08/13/2019 5:13:03 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

A-10s in pairs fly overhead here at Lake of the Ozarks.
Whiteman AFB is their base in Missouri.


48 posted on 08/13/2019 5:14:01 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

A-10s in pairs fly overhead here at Lake of the Ozarks.
Whiteman AFB is their base in Missouri.


49 posted on 08/13/2019 5:14:03 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: painter

Actually stealth is marginally useful where radar guided missiles are concerned (SAMS or AAMS). Stealth can prevent a missile lock. It’s been reported that an F-18 in an exercise “survived” to the merge against some F-35’s but couldn’t lock-up the F-35 and so lost in the knife-fight phase.


50 posted on 08/13/2019 5:18:11 PM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
it is one of those iconic airplanes that just makes one smile

It will be legendary some day. Collect everything about it that you can.

51 posted on 08/13/2019 5:19:06 PM PDT by Rapscallion (If they are not for Trump, they are against him. Fire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: immadashell

Don’t forget the P-47 Thunderbolt “Jug” built by Republic. Great Ground Attack Plane.

It was a tough bird with Armor protecting the Pilot and other vital parts.

They saw duty in Korea.


52 posted on 08/13/2019 5:23:45 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer
I love that aircraft.

Welcome to the club.

53 posted on 08/13/2019 5:39:49 PM PDT by The Duke (President Trump = America's Last, Best Chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo


54 posted on 08/13/2019 5:45:53 PM PDT by Chode (Send bachelors, and come heavily armed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Maybe a high wing version for really rough strips?

The A-10's low wing is to allow for landings with collapsed main landing gears. Notice they're in wing pods and the tires are exposed. The wing also somewhat shields the engines from ground fire at certain angles while the A-10 approaches.

55 posted on 08/13/2019 5:50:17 PM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: OA5599

And the twin rudders and elevator prevent a ground based IR lock onto the engines.

Republic strived to do everything right.


56 posted on 08/13/2019 5:54:28 PM PDT by null and void (Heaven has an impenetrable wall, and a welcoming gate for those qualified, Hell is wide open.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

we have the good fortune to live in an area used for flight training, and aircraft tactical training for a couple of AF units.
We live up on a hill, at the head of a seven mile long valley, with pronounced ridges to the East and the West. We see fighters about three or four times a week, engaged in dogfights, chases, and what I can only imagine are strafing runs up the valley, terminating just a couple hundred feet above our pastures. This has been going on for all the years we’ve lived out here, to the degree that our horses are no longer spooked.
Best one, though, was a couple years back. We regularly see A10’s. But, on this instance, the attack was three of the great beasts, abreast, flying up the valley directly toward us. Impressive. Low and slow, but unstoppable. Low enough that we could wave at the pilots.
Love it!


57 posted on 08/13/2019 5:59:53 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

I’d guess that the USMC (which has 4 Air Wings, counting the Reserves) would be delighted to have these CAS assets!

I say this as a former USMC pilot, Forward Air Controller and Air Liaison Officer. (and a ‘snuffie’ in the mud in Vietnam, who LOVED CAS!)


58 posted on 08/13/2019 6:03:11 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ( crawl up inside the)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: schurmann
A-10s flew 32 percent of combat sorties in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.
Either way what I want to know is kill ratios.
59 posted on 08/13/2019 6:36:58 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: schurmann; Steve Van Doorn

Thank you—I am learning form both and I really enjoy FR threads where several knowledgeable people bring forth the best in eachother.


60 posted on 08/13/2019 7:03:05 PM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, to Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson