Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wildcard_redneck

“...the airframe itself can easily last another 30 years with updates to the electronic hardware, software, and engines.” [wildcard_redneck, post 33]

The airframe might last, but the avionics are already obsolescent. And they cannot be upgraded. Digital MIL STD bus systems are on all recent combat aircraft; the few subsystems on the A-10 were stand-alone. Remaking the entire aircraft would be needed, which would cost more than a new design.

Communications systems are incompatible with the new networked systems concept. It isn’t that new, but it’s been taking extra-long to implement because of resistance from people who don’t understand it. And it isn’t inexpensive either, which rubs Americans the wrong way: we want national defense but still believe it can be done on the cheap.


44 posted on 08/13/2019 4:47:43 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: schurmann
Remaking the entire aircraft would be needed, which would cost more than a new design.

HORSE HOCKEY!

The avionics package and other electronics could EASILY be modernized in NEW airframes. The drawings should still be available, even if the dies were destroyed it's not that big a thing to make new ones.

Defeatists are just as bad as democrats.

68 posted on 08/13/2019 8:35:07 PM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson