Skip to comments.
Tiny home residents reduce energy consumption by nearly half, study shows
Fox News ^
| 8/8/2019
| Christopher Cameron
Posted on 08/09/2019 1:50:50 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
This is Grade "A" BS
To: antidemoncrat
Enjoy your 100sq.ft. shack, peasants. Meanwhile, our rulers will enjoy sumptuous dachas.
2
posted on
08/09/2019 1:52:15 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: antidemoncrat
3
posted on
08/09/2019 1:52:25 PM PDT
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
To: antidemoncrat
Conditioning for the masses.
4
posted on
08/09/2019 1:52:37 PM PDT
by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(Isn't it funny that the very people who scream "My body, my choice" wants a say in your healthcare?)
To: Army Air Corps
Connected by private jets and helicopters.
5
posted on
08/09/2019 1:53:25 PM PDT
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: antidemoncrat
80 Tiny homes, or 80 tiny home residents? The title suggests the latter. If that's the case, energy consumption would be at or near zero.
Tiny home residents:
6
posted on
08/09/2019 1:53:28 PM PDT
by
C210N
(You can vote your way into Socialism; but, you have to shoot your way out of it.)
To: antidemoncrat
Hollywood needs to lead the way and show us how it’s done.
7
posted on
08/09/2019 1:53:50 PM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: antidemoncrat
Which, of course, means no children and only a medium-sized cat.
8
posted on
08/09/2019 1:53:51 PM PDT
by
txrefugee
To: antidemoncrat
We’ll,Duh. My Mimi refrigerator cost less to operate than my big ole side by side.
BeGood/Ross
9
posted on
08/09/2019 1:54:25 PM PDT
by
RossB
To: antidemoncrat
Wow, give up 75% of your already modest home footprint to save 50% on energy. Give up 90% of your current enjoyable creature comforts to save 50% on energy.
Such a deal. I'll sign right up!
The way the Dems are going, it won't be too long before you are provided your allocation of 200 sq ft of living area for your state-limited family of three. "Enjoy your free state housing, Comrade, together with your free health care and free education."
To: antidemoncrat
Composting Toilets are so environmentally conscious too
To: antidemoncrat
So let me get this straight. They’re only using 10% of the space they used to with all the problems in life that creates and yet their Energy savings is only 50%. it should be 90 or 95%.
If I’m going to be miserable, I better say the heck of a lot more than half.
12
posted on
08/09/2019 1:57:48 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(We're living in Dr. Zhivago but without the love triangle)
To: antidemoncrat
I saw some of these on a local TV station which were for sale.
They probably would not qualify as tiny homes as they were around 450 square feet. The appliances were also small but clearly usable. I thought they were neat tho I could not live in one because of claustrophobia.
They were technically mobile homes as they had wheels for moving to where ever you wanted but were intended to be permanently located.
13
posted on
08/09/2019 1:58:37 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: antidemoncrat
tiny home residents reduced their energy consumption by 45 percentNot all that impressive considering a 90% reduction in living space.
But good training to be a prole in the new world order.
14
posted on
08/09/2019 1:58:44 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
To: antidemoncrat
So let’s see, 17.3 acres times 20 million illegals divided by average household size of 3.1.......
115 million acres, or bigger than the state of California
15
posted on
08/09/2019 1:58:45 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: HangnJudge
Composting Toilets are so environmentally conscious too BTDT - don't go there!
16
posted on
08/09/2019 1:59:11 PM PDT
by
grobdriver
(BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
To: antidemoncrat
Wow. Tiny houses use less energy than bigger houses. And this lady got a PhD for figuring that out?
Maybe Ill give it a try: Tiny pets (like hamsters) eat less food than bigger pets (like elephants). Where do I go to collect my PhD?
17
posted on
08/09/2019 1:59:37 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: the OlLine Rebel
18
posted on
08/09/2019 2:00:35 PM PDT
by
salmon76
(Socialism has a perfect track record. It wrecks nations' economies 100% of the time.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
And who wouldn’t race right out to sign up for an apartment in the Commie Collective? Such style, grace, and charm. And no worry about electricity; it’s irrelevant when outages take place 97 percent of the time
19
posted on
08/09/2019 2:00:49 PM PDT
by
Veto!
(Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me))
To: antidemoncrat
I read an article about tiny home livers. The author couldn’t find any people who had made it a year, but found plenty who had given up after a few months.
20
posted on
08/09/2019 2:01:06 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson