Tiny home residents:
Posted on 08/09/2019 1:50:50 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
In her doctoral thesis, Saxton surveyed 80 people who had moved from a full-sized home to a “tiny” home for a year or more. She then calculated their ecological footprints, or how much space they need to sustain their current behavior, including housing, transportation, food, goods and servicesHer research showed that tiny home residents’ average ecological footprint was about 9.5 acres, down from about 17.3 acres for regular-sized homes.
In other words, tiny home residents reduced their energy consumption by 45 percent.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Enjoy your 100sq.ft. shack, peasants. Meanwhile, our rulers will enjoy sumptuous dachas.
PAGING CAPTAIN OBVIOUS!
Conditioning for the masses.
Connected by private jets and helicopters.
Tiny home residents:
Hollywood needs to lead the way and show us how it’s done.
Which, of course, means no children and only a medium-sized cat.
We’ll,Duh. My Mimi refrigerator cost less to operate than my big ole side by side.
BeGood/Ross
Such a deal. I'll sign right up!
The way the Dems are going, it won't be too long before you are provided your allocation of 200 sq ft of living area for your state-limited family of three. "Enjoy your free state housing, Comrade, together with your free health care and free education."
Composting Toilets are so environmentally conscious too
So let me get this straight. They’re only using 10% of the space they used to with all the problems in life that creates and yet their Energy savings is only 50%. it should be 90 or 95%.
If I’m going to be miserable, I better say the heck of a lot more than half.
I saw some of these on a local TV station which were for sale.
They probably would not qualify as tiny homes as they were around 450 square feet. The appliances were also small but clearly usable. I thought they were neat tho I could not live in one because of claustrophobia.
They were technically mobile homes as they had wheels for moving to where ever you wanted but were intended to be permanently located.
Not all that impressive considering a 90% reduction in living space.
But good training to be a prole in the new world order.
So let’s see, 17.3 acres times 20 million illegals divided by average household size of 3.1.......
115 million acres, or bigger than the state of California
BTDT - don't go there!
Wow. Tiny houses use less energy than bigger houses. And this lady got a PhD for figuring that out?
Maybe I’ll give it a try: Tiny pets (like hamsters) eat less food than bigger pets (like elephants). Where do I go to collect my PhD?
And who wouldn’t race right out to sign up for an apartment in the Commie Collective? Such style, grace, and charm. And no worry about electricity; it’s irrelevant when outages take place 97 percent of the time
I read an article about tiny home livers. The author couldn’t find any people who had made it a year, but found plenty who had given up after a few months.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.