Posted on 08/06/2019 8:42:30 PM PDT by Morgana
An Arkansas town council recently joined a growing list of U.S. cities that are taking a stand against abortion.
The Arkansas Democrat Gazette reports the Springdale City Council Committee of the Whole voted unanimously Monday to adopt the pro-life statement. The full city council plans to vote on the measure Aug. 13.
The statement declares Springdale to be a pro-life city. It also tells the abortion chain Planned Parenthood that it is not welcome there, according to the report.
Though the statement does not have any legal weight, it sends a message that Springdale supports life, said council member Colby Fulfer, who proposed the measure.
“There’s no way we’re going to ban abortion,” because Roe v. Wade is still in place, he said. “We want to say the government of Springdale supports life from creation to conception to the end stages of life.”
Fulfer said he is concerned about Planned Parenthood opening a new location in their city after it closed its Fayetteville branch in July. The abortion chain said it had trouble with its landlord, and it is looking for a new location.
The city’s pro-life statement is “respectfully asking the abortion provider to find another city,” he added.
According to the local news, Fulfer also brought up programs that the city supports to help families in need.
Springfield is not alone. A growing number of towns and cities have passed resolutions this year in response to the radical pro-abortion agenda that is being pushed on Americans. The Democratic presidential candidates all support forcing taxpayers to fund abortions and oppose minor, common sense restrictions on abortions after viability.
Several states, including New York, Illinois and Rhode Island, also passed pro-abortion laws this year to allow viable, late-term unborn babies to be aborted for basically any reason.
In response, Roswell, New Mexico city leaders passed a pro-life resolution in March after state lawmakers considered a radical pro-abortion bill to expand late-term abortions. The bill narrowly failed to pass.
In New York state, Batavia city leaders and Putnam County legislators also passed measures condemning a radical new pro-abortion law in their state and supporting protections for the unborn.
Then, in June, the eastern Texas city of Waskom adopted a pro-life ordinance declaring their home a “sanctuary city for the unborn.” In July, another Texas city considered a similar pro-life measure, but the council voted against it after the ACLU threatened a costly lawsuit.
In May, the Riverton City Council in Utah passed a similar resolution, declaring the city a “sanctuary for the unborn.” In June, the Utah County Commission unanimously passed a resolution supporting protections for unborn babies. Then in July, the council in Highland, Utah passed a similar pro-life resolution.
A Sanctuary City for babies! God bless them!
How much did they get for the landlord's body parts? Or has his/her body been found yet?
Some obama judge will undo it
A Sanctuary City for babies! God bless them!
You will be safe ‘holding your breath’ until a Fed Judge deems it illegal and the LIBs will move to impeach PDJT for planting such ideas in peoples heads.
Perhaps. I celebrate their stance, regardless.
[ Some obama judge will undo it ]
They had better have written the law to state : “As long as any other city/county/or state has sanctuary laws permitting illegal aliens protection from ICE, we reserve the absolute right to do the same for babies in the womb vs. Planned Parenthood.”
I would love the dems to have to pick either illegals or abortions and show their true buck nekkid arses in front of everyone.
We need more cities, states, and counties to do this until it forced the feds to either enforce federal laws equally or allow us to self govern!
The Democrats aren’t going to like that one bit.
A Sanctuary City for babies! God bless them!
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Springdale, AR: home of the Duggar family (19 kids & counting)
Bkmk
>
They had better have written the law to state : “As long as any other city/county/or state has sanctuary laws permitting illegal aliens protection from ICE, we reserve the absolute right to do the same for babies in the womb vs. Planned Parenthood.”
>
I would rather it be on 9th/10th grounds; though, they’d better up to par on their stance of the 2nd (Constitutional) too.
Hence why, IMO, the whole State vs. Fedzilla is as much one big circle jerk as 3-co-equal-branches
There goes the town’s budget, defending against a constitutional contest.
“...impeach PDJT for planting such ideas in peoples heads.”
He’s making the common folk uppity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.