Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kalamata
Danny Denier post #336: "Child."

Danny Denier: "Child."

Danny Denier: "Child."

Danny Denier: "Child."

Danny Denier: "Delusional child."

Danny Denier: "Foolish child."

Those are just Kalamata's slavish obedience to Denier Rules #5, #6 & #7.

Danny Denier: "No, Joey, I asked for evidence and you don’t know where to find it, because there is none."

That is just Kalamata's slavish obedience to Denier Rules #1, #2, #5, #6, #7 .

Danny Denier on fossil evidence: "It is not a problem for me, Joey; it is a problem for charlatans like you — those trying to convince me and others that the lack of evidence is evidence.
Charlie explained how his theory was supposed to work.
Show us evidence that it actually worked, and I will become an evolutionist (again,) and fade away into the sunset.
In the meantime, I won’t hold my breath."

By your own claim, you already have "thousands of books" on the subject, so you already know where & what the evidence is, and you can't/won't see it.
Like a Holocaust denier in a Holocaust museum, you can spend all day looking and never see it.

That is DD's slavish obedience to Denier Rules #1 & #9.

Danny Denier: "Fossils are evidence of a quick burial in sediment carried by a flood of highly-mineralized sea water, Joey.
I asked you for evidence of evolution."

More slavish obedience to Denier Rules #1, #2 & #9.

Danny Denier: "That is correct.
There is no evidence for evolution in any of my books, and I have a very extensive collection, covering all graduate-level evolutionary fields."

A remarkable admission of your obedience to Denier Rules #1 & #9.

Danny Denier claiming my words as his own: ">>Kalamata: “No Holocaust denier I debated ever made such an amazing claim.”"

Danny Denier: "You have never debated a holocaust denier.
That claim is your fallback when you cannot defend your warped religion of evolutionism.
Slander is the chief tool of practically every evolutionist."

That is Denier Rules #5, #6  with implied rule #10.

Danny Denier: "Joey, I exhort you to refrain from using Wikipedia as proof text.
It makes you look dumber than you already look."

Denier Rules #5 & #12.

Danny Denier: "Just when I begin to think you have finally ran out of dumb things to say, you say something even dumber.
Every evolutionary scholar worth his salt is aware that Darwin’s Tree of Life is a relic. "

"Tree of life" is a metaphor, just as is your own "bushes of life".
No metaphor is perfect -- if it was it wouldn't be a mere metaphor.

Danny Denier: "I am trying to be kind here, Joey, but your obsession in believing you know more about genetics than some of the top scientists in the world is similar to what is typically called, delusions of grandeur."

I am trying to be kind here, Danny boy, but your obsession in believing you somehow speak for some of the top scientists in the world is similar to what is typically called, delusions of grandeur.

That's Denier Rule #13, among others.

Danny Denier: "That is a just-so story, Joey. Science requires evidence."

Evidence which Danny Denier can't/won't see, Rule #1.

Danny Denier: "Thus far, Joey, I am unconvinced you have any knowlege about any field of evolution that we have been discussing.
You don’t seem to know even the most rudimentary aspects or doctrine.
Any child can search Wikipedia, or post photos of Museum mockups, as you are comfortable in doing.
But that is not science, Joey."

Thus far, Danny boy, I am unconvinced that you are anything more than an old-time Holocaust denier who now can't find an audience for such nonsense and so has switched over to the even bigger denial subject of evolution specifically, natural-science generally.
Any child can hand-wave at "thousands of books" or walk through museums proclaiming, "I see nothing!".
But that is neither science nor Christian religion, oh, Danny boy.

Danny Denier: "That is just another story, Joey, with no supporting evidence, and it is beyond obvious that you are completely and totally ignorant of modern research.
May I recommend you confine your debates to something other than science, such as Political Science, which is not science; or cooking, in which you will do well as long as you don’t burn the food or poison anyone."

Literal mountains of supporting evidence which Danny boy just won't see.

Danny Denier: "You are too scientifically illiterate to understand what I am about to say, Joey; but you are embarrassing yourself."

Denier Rule #7.

421 posted on 09/15/2019 10:22:28 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

>>Danny Denier post #3 36: “Child.” Danny Denier: “Child.” Danny Denier: “Child.” Danny Denier: “Child.” Danny Denier: “Delusional child.” Danny Denier: “Foolish child.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Those are just Kalamata’s slavish obedience to Denier Rules #5, #6 & #7.”

Whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “No, Joey, I asked for evidence and you don’t know where to find it, because there is none.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “That is just Kalamata’s slavish obedience to Denier Rules #1, #2, #5, #6, #7 .

Quit whining. Show us some observable, repeatable scientific evidence, child, and you can put this matter to rest. No highly-imaginative museum mockups, or appeals to your mystical “mountains of evidence,” please.

*****************
>>Danny Denier on fossil evidence: “It is not a problem for me, Joey; it is a problem for charlatans like you — those trying to convince me and others that the lack of evidence is evidence. Charlie explained how his theory was supposed to work. Show us evidence that it actually worked, and I will become an evolutionist (again,) and fade away into the sunset. In the meantime, I won’t hold my breath.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “By your own claim, you already have “thousands of books” on the subject, so you already know where & what the evidence is, and you can’t/won’t see it.

Joey, I have in my library, for quick reference, most of the commonly referenced paleontology books that have been published over the last 30 or 40 years. Perhaps you will be so kind as to point to a page number and paragraph in any of them where I can find scientifically veriable evidence for common descent. If you will do so, I will post the paragraph in context, for everyone to read, and I will admit that evolution is true.

Fair enough, Whiny Child?

*****************
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Like a Holocaust denier in a Holocaust museum, you can spend all day looking and never see it. That is DD’s slavish obedience to Denier Rules #1 & #9.

When all else fails, Whiny Joey seeks one of the refuges of scoundrels, in this case, slander! Some of the other refugees, which Joey frequently resorts to, are called “appeals to authority,”, such as “overwhelming evidence,” or “consensus says,” or the “Federal Courts ruled.” But none of that is science, but rather is brow-beating — thuggery.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “Fossils are evidence of a quick burial in sediment carried by a flood of highly-mineralized sea water, Joey. I asked you for evidence of evolution.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “More slavish obedience to Denier Rules #1, #2 & #9.”

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “That is correct. There is no evidence for evolution in any of my books, and I have a very extensive collection, covering all graduate-level evolutionary fields.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “A remarkable admission of your obedience to Denier Rules #1 & #9.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “You have never debated a holocaust denier. That claim is your fallback when you cannot defend your warped religion of evolutionism. Slander is the chief tool of practically every evolutionist.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “That is Denier Rules #5, #6  with implied rule #10.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “Joey, I exhort you to refrain from using Wikipedia as proof text. It makes you look dumber than you already look.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Denier Rules #5 & #12.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “Just when I begin to think you have finally ran out of dumb things to say, you say something even dumber. Every evolutionary scholar worth his salt is aware that Darwin’s Tree of Life is a relic. “
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Tree of life” is a metaphor, just as is your own “bushes of life”. No metaphor is perfect — if it was it wouldn’t be a mere metaphor.

There is plenty of evidence for a bush of life, but none for a tree of life. Besides, the bush of was coined by a devout evolutionist, Craig Venter, to the astonishment of other devout evolutionists in the room (naughty, naughty, musn’t publically doubt Darwin.)

This is Venter. The “bush of life” part comes about 2 minutes into this segment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBPAOaC_KaY&t=07m48s

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “I am trying to be kind here, Joey, but your obsession in believing you know more about genetics than some of the top scientists in the world is similar to what is typically called, delusions of grandeur.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “I am trying to be kind here, Danny boy, but your obsession in believing you somehow speak for some of the top scientists in the world is similar to what is typically called, delusions of grandeur. That’s Denier Rule #13, among others.”

I quote them, Joey. You pretend to speak for them through your CNN, I mean Snopes, I mean Wikipedia copy/paste adventures.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “That is a just-so story, Joey. Science requires evidence.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Evidence which Danny Denier can’t/won’t see, Rule #1.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “Thus far, Joey, I am unconvinced you have any knowlege about any field of evolution that we have been discussing. You don’t seem to know even the most rudimentary aspects or doctrine. Any child can search Wikipedia, or post photos of Museum mockups, as you are comfortable in doing. But that is not science, Joey.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Thus far, Danny boy, I am unconvinced that you are anything more than an old-time Holocaust denier who now can’t find an audience for such nonsense and so has switched over to the even bigger denial subject of evolution specifically, natural-science generally.

Joey is obviously comfortable in slandering Jews who do not buy into his warped worldview. Isn’t slander a Far-Left political tactic? Of course it is. They also whine when they do not get their way, like Joey. Therefore, it is reasonable to assumen that Joey is a closet Leftist. Perhaps one of the Seminar Caller types.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Any child can hand-wave at “thousands of books” or walk through museums proclaiming, “I see nothing!”. But that is neither science nor Christian religion, oh, Danny boy.

The truth of the matter is that I don’t have enough faith to believe in evolutionism. I require scientific evidence. I should have been from Missouri.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “That is just another story, Joey, with no supporting evidence, and it is beyond obvious that you are completely and totally ignorant of modern research. May I recommend you confine your debates to something other than science, such as Political Science, which is not science; or cooking, in which you will do well as long as you don’t burn the food or poison anyone.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Literal mountains of supporting evidence which Danny boy just won’t see.

I see Joey has returned to hand-waving and appeals to authority.

Still no evidence of evolution from the whiny child.

*****************
>>Danny Denier: “You are too scientifically illiterate to understand what I am about to say, Joey; but you are embarrassing yourself.”
>>Whiny Joey wrote: “Denier Rule #7.

Whiny child.

Mr. Kalamata


429 posted on 09/16/2019 8:21:05 AM PDT by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson