Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

“By definition, science deals only in natural explanations for natural processes.”

Nope. Wrong, again. Science deals with observations. An observation can be non-natural.


218 posted on 08/13/2019 7:26:47 PM PDT by CodeToad ( Hating on Trump is hating on me and Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad; BroJoeK

>>Nope. Wrong, again. Science deals with observations. An observation can be non-natural.

I am reasonably certain that Joe doesn’t understand the relationship between science and observation. He believes science and imagination go together.

Mr. Kalamata


220 posted on 08/13/2019 8:37:37 PM PDT by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad
quoting BJK: "By definition, science deals only in natural explanations for natural processes.”

Code Toad: "Nope. Wrong, again.
Science deals with observations.
An observation can be non-natural."

By historical definition, natural philosophy (today's science) deals only in natural explanations for natural processes.
Everything else came under different categories, especially theology.

Your personal compulsion to redefine science to better suit your own theological perspective is not recognized by any natural scientist, living or past.

222 posted on 08/14/2019 6:30:39 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson