>>The concept of “Abiogenesis” is about the stupidest form of pseudo-science imaginable. It barely rises to the level of pseudo-science.<<
Yet it is the “go-to” for CRitters. The usual form of the question is “if TToE is real where did people come from?”
My pointing out that abiogenesis is meaningless in the discussion of TToE usually gets ignored.
And when you post from a “scientist” you should post from a scientist.
But thanks for the entertainment. Rather than the science version of rachel madcow you previously posted (behe), now we get a PeeWee Herman. Did you get this from Sac Bee?
>>Yet it is the “go-to” for CRitters. The usual form of the question is “if TToE is real where did people come from?”
I see the clown is back.
*************************
>>My pointing out that abiogenesis is meaningless in the discussion of TToE usually gets ignored.
You cannot have an “Origin of the Species” without an origin.
*************************
>>And when you post from a “scientist” you should post from a scientist.
Fair enough. I will try to minimize my quotes from papers and books by evolutionists.
*************************
>>But thanks for the entertainment. Rather than the science version of rachel madcow you previously posted (behe), now we get a PeeWee Herman. Did you get this from Sac Bee?
Grow up.
Mr. Kalamata