So, if the answer is 16, then 8/2(2+2) =16 is an equation which is true.
Incorrect conclusion. 1 does not = 16. That is NOT a true equation.
All of the bullshit about interpretation is just that.
You use entry into a calculator as some kind of justification. Nonsense.
This is basic 6th or 7th grade algebra, not some great mystery.
The question sucks. It’s not a well written equation. As written and based on order of prescient the answer is 16 or 1. All based on interpretation of the very badly written question. I have a mathe and engineering degree. That doesn’t give me the authority to tell people they are bullshit. I think that would require either a biology or genetic .background.
I would fail anyone who left an ambiguous question. I haven’t read all the useless posts on the matter.
You might want to re-read what I wrote, we appear to be in agreement.
I wrote IF the answer is 16, and worked backward to solve for x which comes out to .125, which it is clearly not.
If setting the equation to 1, and solving for x, it solves as 2, which is the number originally used.
As you say, simple algebra.
It's all good.