Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe diGenova: Barr's Comey decision was the right call. But this is just the beginning
fox news ^ | 8/2/2019 | JOE DIGENOVA

Posted on 08/02/2019 1:20:35 PM PDT by bitt

The decision not to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey over his deliberate leaks to the media isn’t a sign of weakness or lack of will, but of the professionalism and well-reasoned restraint of President Trump’s Department of Justice.

Attorney General Bill Barr’s number one goal since taking the helm at the DOJ has been to restore the impartial and professional ethos that has characterized that agency for more than 200 years.

He is working diligently to cleanse it of the stain of politically driven vindictiveness that Obama-era officials created by grossly mishandling the Clinton email investigation, and then, even more egregiously, orchestrating the series of events that led to the Russiagate witch hunt.

ROBERT MUELLER'S RUSSIA INVESTIGATION BY THE NUMBERS

Before this “investigation of the investigators” is over, there will undoubtedly be many cases of misconduct that warrant criminal prosecution. Comey’s, however, was not one of them.

What Comey did -- release private memos made in the course of his employment as FBI director to politically damage the president of the United States, who had just fired him for unrelated misconduct -- was absolutely outrageous, and totally unbecoming of the leader of this country’s premier criminal investigatory agency. It speaks volumes about Comey’s corrupt character and further illustrates why both President Trump and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that Comey was no longer fit to serve in that role.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agbarr; barr; comey; comeycrimes; digenova
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 last
To: USS Alaska
Incorrect conclusion. 1 does not = 16. That is NOT a true equation.

You might want to re-read what I wrote, we appear to be in agreement.

I wrote IF the answer is 16, and worked backward to solve for x which comes out to .125, which it is clearly not.

If setting the equation to 1, and solving for x, it solves as 2, which is the number originally used.

As you say, simple algebra.

It's all good.

101 posted on 08/03/2019 9:14:41 PM PDT by going hot (happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I sure hope we still have something to save when Barr decides to give us a hand.


102 posted on 08/05/2019 3:12:54 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson