Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: New Jersey Realist
Numbers are such neat things.

8 divided by the quantity 2(2+2) can be written 8/2(2+2)

So, if the answer is 16, then 8/2(2+2) =16 is an equation which is true.

Substituting for the number in parenthesis, using X for the 2, looks like this :

8/2(x+x) = 16

8= 16 times 2(2x)

8= 16 times 4 x

8= 64 X

x = .125, which it does not. However, if 8 /2(2+2) = 1

8/ 2(x+x)=1

8 = 1 times 2(2x)

8 = 4x 8/4 =x

2 = x

it comes down to how the expression 2(2+2) is handled, not how one enters it into a calculator, because by definition, entering it into a calculator when it is expressed in long form must be entered as it is written. However, the expression 2(2+2) has to be treated as one number, same as if it were x(y+y) would be entered as how it reads, but in reality it is considered the number x2y.

87 posted on 08/03/2019 10:32:31 AM PDT by going hot (happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: going hot
8 divided by the quantity 2(2+2) can be written 8/2(2+2)

So, if the answer is 16, then 8/2(2+2) =16 is an equation which is true.

Incorrect conclusion. 1 does not = 16. That is NOT a true equation.

All of the bullshit about interpretation is just that.

You use entry into a calculator as some kind of justification. Nonsense.

This is basic 6th or 7th grade algebra, not some great mystery.

97 posted on 08/03/2019 4:28:25 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist mooselimb savages, today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson