No, 16. Over a hundred years ago it would have been 1 but “modern” math says 16. You can check it out here: https://educationtrick.com/2019/07/31/what-is-8%C3%B7222-the-correct-answer-explained/
8 divided by the quantity 2(2+2) can be written 8/2(2+2)
So, if the answer is 16, then 8/2(2+2) =16 is an equation which is true.
Substituting for the number in parenthesis, using X for the 2, looks like this :
8/2(x+x) = 16
8= 16 times 2(2x)
8= 16 times 4 x
8= 64 X
x = .125, which it does not. However, if 8 /2(2+2) = 1
8/ 2(x+x)=1
8 = 1 times 2(2x)
8 = 4x 8/4 =x
2 = x
it comes down to how the expression 2(2+2) is handled, not how one enters it into a calculator, because by definition, entering it into a calculator when it is expressed in long form must be entered as it is written. However, the expression 2(2+2) has to be treated as one number, same as if it were x(y+y) would be entered as how it reads, but in reality it is considered the number x2y.