Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamuraiScot

It is not being disputed that what Comey did was illegal. It is agreed that what he did was illegal. The only reason DOJ said they would not prosecute was because it would be difficult to prove Comey’s intent. They are not saying what he did was legal or that the memo was not classified.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-james-comey-having-mismarked-secret-memo-at-home-was-illegal

The Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz sent a referral to the Justice Department about memos Comey leaked, which he testified was done in the hopes they would spark a special counsel investigation. Although prosecutors found the watchdog’s findings compelling, they decided against prosecution under classified information protection laws because of there being too much uncertainty surrounding Comey’s intent. Comey has denied leaking classified information in his memos.


50 posted on 08/02/2019 3:36:18 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (What profits a man if he gains the world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Comey broke the law - undisputed. What does intent have to do with it?

I would think that his actions in releasing the memo would verify intent. Why not let a jury decide?


61 posted on 08/02/2019 8:48:32 PM PDT by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson