Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FatherofFive

” Is this the same with this?”

Curious enough to ask but not curious enough to read.


8 posted on 07/31/2019 1:51:33 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

The article doesn’t clearly say. It is noted that the argon and nitrogen from the incoming atmospheric air are being sold; it does not say how that separation process is being powered. We are left to assume (a bad strategy) that the plat is powering that process parasitically from their energy output.

Also woefully deficient, here, is the cavalier “Oh, we’ll get to that” handling of present-hour issues with the planned sequestration of CO2 in deep geological formations; and the offhand comment about earthquakes gave me a chuckle, as well.

More than likely; the plane will produce more CO2 than it can sell, sequestration plans won’t be ready to implement, and excess “captured” CO2 will end up getting released to atmosphere.


28 posted on 07/31/2019 4:39:46 PM PDT by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson