Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freeport

As a biased Navy vet and looking ahead at our biggest threats which mainly exist in the Pacific Rim, I think the refocus is appropriate for a Service that is part of the Dept. of the Navy. The Marine Corps can and should stop being an auxiliary force of the Army.


3 posted on 07/30/2019 7:34:20 AM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: twister881

I can’t disagree. The bigger problem is the “How they get to the fight.” part. One is certainly not air lifting the force en total, so it’s ships. If the big ships are gone, and it’ll be 10 - 20 years for a bunch of smaller ships to get designed, built and incorporated, what is the short term solution 10 - 15 years?


4 posted on 07/30/2019 7:42:10 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: twister881
I think the refocus is appropriate for a Service that is part of the Dept. of the Navy. The Marine Corps can and should stop being an auxiliary force of the Army.

Yes, that would be: the mens department..

Semper Fi, Squid! LOL!

5 posted on 07/30/2019 7:58:20 AM PDT by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis, Statists, Commies & other DemoKKKrats: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson