Posted on 07/28/2019 4:07:29 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
The fight over President Trump’s tax returns has moved to the courts.
In recent weeks, the Democratic-led House Ways and Means Committee has filed a lawsuit in an effort to obtain Trump’s federal tax returns, and Trump has filed a lawsuit to prevent the committee from getting his New York state tax returns.
The court cases are sure to be closely watched. Democrats view obtaining Trump’s tax returns as a key oversight priority. Trump is the first president in decades who refused to voluntarily release any of his tax returns, and he is determined to keep them private.
Here’s what you need to know about the lawsuits concerning Trump’s tax returns.
What are the two different lawsuits?
Two separate cases were filed in federal court in D.C. this month.
In the first lawsuit, filed at the beginning of the month, the Ways and Means Committee is suing the Treasury Department, the IRS and the agencies’ leaders. The committee is asking the court to order the agencies to provide the committee with six years of Trump’s personal and business federal tax returns.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) requested Trump’s tax returns in April under a provision in the federal tax code that says the Treasury secretary “shall furnish” tax returns requested by the chairs of Congress’s tax committees. Neal has said that his committee wants the returns because it is conducting oversight and considering legislative proposals about how the IRS enforces tax laws against a president.
But Treasury and the IRS rejected those requests and subsequent subpoenas Neal issued, saying that Neal’s request lacks a “legitimate legislative purpose.”
Both Democrats and the Trump administration expected the dispute to end up in court. Democrats in their lawsuit are asking the court to require the administration to comply with the tax code provision and their subpoenas.
The second lawsuit, filed this week by Trump in his personal capacity, centers on a New York state law enacted earlier this month that allows Congress’s tax committees to request public officials’ state tax returns from the commissioner of the New York Department of Taxation and Finance. Neal has not yet made a decision about whether he will request Trump’s state tax returns under the law.
Trump is suing the Ways and Means Committee, New York Attorney General Letitia James (D), and New York Department of Taxation and Finance Commissioner Michael Schmidt. Trump’s personal lawyers are arguing that the committee lacks a legitimate legislative purpose for using the New York law and that the law violates the First Amendment of the Constitution.
What's the latest in the lawsuit over Trump's NY returns?
Most of the recent court developments in the tax return fight relate to the lawsuit over the New York law.
Trump on Wednesday filed an emergency application, asking a judge to enjoin Neal from requesting his New York tax returns until the president has an opportunity to be heard in court. The Ways and Means Committee is objecting to the motion, arguing that courts lack jurisdiction to bar it from utilizing the New York law.
Trump also argued that the two tax return lawsuits are related and should be heard by the same judge, while the New York officials who are defendants in his lawsuit disagreed.
At a hearing on Thursday, Judge Trevor McFadden, who is assigned to the lawsuit over the request for Trump’s federal returns, ruled that he should not also be assigned to the lawsuit over the New York law. He did not issue a ruling on Trump’s emergency motion.
The new judge assigned to the case has scheduled a hearing on Trump's emergency motion for Monday afternoon.
In the lawsuit over the request for Trump's federal tax returns, the next big step is for the administration to respond to the Ways and Means Committee's complaint.
Trump and several of his business entities have been added to the case as intervenor-defendants, meaning they will also have the opportunity to be heard in the case. McFadden said in an order that before Trump and his businesses file any motions, they have to discuss with the administration whether they can file briefs in a consolidated manner.
Who are the judges in the cases?
McFadden, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge who is handling the lawsuit over Trump’s federal tax returns, is a Trump appointee who had been randomly assigned to the case shortly after it was filed.
McFadden started as a D.C. district judge in October 2017. Earlier this year, McFadden ruled that the House didn’t have standing to sue to temporarily bar Trump from using military funds for a border wall. That ruling has caught the attention of legal experts following the lawsuit over Trump’s federal tax returns since they think it is likely that the Trump administration will argue the House lacks standing to sue in that case as well.
But experts also note that McFadden’s ruling in the border wall case pointed out that there are differences between the House’s standing to sue to get information for an investigation and whether the House has standing to sue over its appropriations power.
After McFadden ruled that he should not be handling both of the tax return lawsuits, the lawsuit over the New York tax return law on Friday was randomly assigned to Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee who was just confirmed by the Senate in May.
Nichols most recently was a partner at the law firm WilmerHale. He previously served as a top lawyer in former President George W. Bush’s Department of Justice (DOJ) and as a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. While at the DOJ, he was the lead counsel in defending former White House counsel Harriet Miers in a lawsuit brought by the House Judiciary Committee trying to enforce a subpoena.
What are House Democrats doing to bolster their case?
House Democrats on Thursday released documents related to Congress’s scrutiny of former President Nixon’s tax returns in an effort to show that their request for Trump’s tax returns isn’t unique.
The documents the Ways and Means Committee released show that the Joint Committee on Taxation in the 1970s had made a request to the IRS for Nixon’s tax returns while he was president and received them from the agency on the same day that the request was made. The documents also show that the Joint Committee on Taxation had requested and received tax returns from years that predate the tax returns Nixon publicly released and that predate his presidency.
The Trump administration has repeatedly argued that Democrats’ request for Trump’s returns is unprecedented. But Democrats argue that the newly released documents demonstrate that is not the case.
Republicans are countering that the Nixon and Trump tax return requests are different because Nixon had asked the Joint Committee on Taxation to examine his tax returns. Trump, however, doesn’t want Congress to see his tax filings.
The Nixon-era documents were released after the Ways and Means Committee first examined a portion of them behind closed doors and then voted to send them to the House. If the panel ever obtains Trump’s tax returns, it would undertake a similar process to review them and vote to make parts or all of them public.
And Obama sealed his school and immigration records...
This is the real purpose of the Democrat's actions-to make them public so that their voters would react, "Nobody should be allowed to be that rich", and the MSM would chime in, "No, they shouldn't. Impeach him!"
There's no legislative need for them to see his returns; we already have an IRS for that, which is known to be very anti-conservative already.
These MF ers need to be taken to the shed, enough. I believe if there is ample evidence of criminal conspiracy against the president they must all be taken down one at a time and the loud mouths who continue to harass the president will be looking to stay out of jail, IT NEEDS TO BE DONE
“Trump is the first president in decades who refused to voluntarily release any of his tax returns,...”
Obummer released his?
most American voters do NOT want Congress or the corrupt commie judges in some courts to publicize ANYBODY’s tax returns
besides, DJT doesn’t (can’t) do his own returns, they are very complex and lengthy
he hires some of America’s best CPA’s
so just about all anyone can expect from reading the returns
will be
1. headache
2. MANY some stuff to harass DJT’s cpa’s about
maybe
that’s it
a total waste of time and our tax money
The members of the Democratic-led House Ways and Means Committee should be issued restraining orders and jailed for stalking. Are they a bunch of busy-bodies who have already decided that Trump broke some law somewhere, somehow, over the past thirty years? Don't they need to justify such an action based on alleged wrong doing?
The Democratic-led House Ways and Means Committee comes across as Soviet style thugs who want to make DJT cry "uncle" simply because they do not like him, and they think they can. They want a show trial.
There are many people in this country who do NOT like communists.
So, apparently, only Republican Presidents are required to show their returns.
The DemocRATs have never said what purpose is served by obtaining the President’s returns. If he had ever committed tax fraud, certainly the IRS would have uncovered it decades ago, so we know they are not concerned about that. But, vague utterances about “oversight” aside, what do they hope to gain?
If the CORRUPT IRS didn’t find anything wrong, then WTH should these Democrats get them? ILLEGAL!
Unreasonable search and seizure - access denied.....
If Trump had anything amiss with his tax returns, the IRS would have caught it a long time ago.
Well “oversite” is about what PDJT does as President - not how much he earned or what he paid in taxes as a private citizen.
No legislative reason for the request despite the precedent.
Jagoda - Any relation to Genrikh Yagoda?
it is NOT THE JOB OF CONGRESS to waste time and money going over the President’s old tax records.
That time and money was already wasted by the IRS. If the returns were good for them, they should be good for Congress.
Imprison the Democrats.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.
... including tax returns.
“Imprison the Democrats.”
SPJNK x 100.
This isn’t “oversight”, this is pure “Hate & Harassment”.
Re: the New York Law
It smells of:
a) ex post facto law (he filed returns under rules of confidentiality, then a law was passed to expose them), and
b) a bill of attainder (can’t pass a law against one person)
Bingo!
Or, alternatively, “Ha! Trump's not as rich as he claimed to be”. I've heard both arguments, coming from the same sort of people — sometimes the same people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.