Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nikos1121

RADCLIFFE: [citation]
“Which DOD policy says . . . that an investigative person is not exonerated if innocence is not conclusively determined?”
MUELLER: “uh, uh, I can’t say.”
RADCLIFFE: Because . . . it doesn’t exist.


183 posted on 07/24/2019 6:13:27 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aspasia

Bears repeating: :)

RADCLIFFE: [citation]
“Which DOD policy says . . . that an investigative person is not exonerated if innocence is not conclusively determined?”
MUELLER: “uh, uh, I can’t say.”
RADCLIFFE: Because . . . it doesn’t exist.


200 posted on 07/24/2019 6:15:11 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: aspasia

RADCLIFFE: “Special Counsel applied this . . . the very first line of your report . . . here’s the problem, you don’t do that. The SC made neither a prosecution decision or a declination decision . . . you didn’t follow the special regulations. You wrote 180 pages about decisions not reached. Volume 2 was not authorized . . written in violation DOD principle.”


203 posted on 07/24/2019 6:16:12 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson