Or maybe internal polling suggested to her that perhaps a more public hard line on the border issue was needed to get re-elected...
... and then just continue to support the democrat subversion efforts afterwards.
We have a bingo!
Bingo.
This brings up an interesting idea. She’s an Arizonan, and thus very different from her colleagues since she knows firsthand how bad things are at the border. Perhaps our House and Senate could be divided into “conferences” like college sports — Southwest Conference, Northeast Conference, etc., — which would decide issues related to the various regions of the country. It galls me no end, for example, to hear some smug New York pol pontificating about land use in the West when he’s never been further west than Chicago. Similarly, why is some Oregon representative voting on a bill impacting steel workers in Michigan? The full House and Senate could of course vote on truly national issues, but it seems like regional issues should be left to the regional representatives who actually understand them.
Or maybe internal polling suggested to her that perhaps a more public hard line on the border issue was needed to get re-elected...
... and then just continue to support the democrat subversion efforts afterwards.
************
Bingo.
Her current stance is all kabuki theater.
She’s for it now, because it has no real traction in the House. If it gains traction in the House, she’ll be loudly against it.
And her base won’t remember a thing otherwise and if anyone says anything, they’ll just be racists.