[grey_whiskers]

Why do you think Myrah felt the need to misrepresent the findings?

She didn't misrepresent. There's a lot of backstory behind the testing. Including the samples being all taken from the same area where it had previously been agreed NOT to take samples from.

Including some of the testers having an agenda to disprove the Shroud going in, and chortling about the results.

Including the results (supposedly from the same homogeneous sample) giving results for the age outside of each others 95% confidence error bars.

But by all means, keep on trolling.

[semimojo]

Even with your supposed "backstory", which was strangely not provided in the article, I don't see any evidence of fraud.

Even if your story is sound, she's specifically referencing the Casabianca's study which in no way alleged fraud.

Stop defending disingenuous click bait artists.