Posted on 07/16/2019 3:33:42 PM PDT by Libloather
Climate change deniers have been getting excited about a recent paper published online titled No Experimental Evidence For The Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change, which goes against the widely accepted scientific consensus on climate change based on many years of climate data.
The paper, yet to be accepted for peer-review but published online on pre-print site arXiv, claims to "prove that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature" and the recent United Nations IPCC report (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) failed to include this. The authors claim that human contribution to global warming, estimated to be around 1°C over the past century, has thus been overestimated and is actually about 0.01°C.
"The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high, because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models," the authors of the document write.
"If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice."
(Excerpt) Read more at iflscience.com ...
One can’t help but notice that while various “solutions”
to “climate change” are given, no information is given
in how to deal with any resulting effects.
How best to survive the coming conditions?
What to do when...oceans rise, crops fail etc.
The answer is always to give governments more power NOW!
You’d think if the problem were that serious and the ability
to prevent it so remote, they would give more thought to
dealing with the aftermath...but Noooooo.
I’ve never heard of the site before. It was interesting to see that no one on the site seems to have any academic credentials listed.
It reminds me of “I’m not a doctor but I play one on TV.”
You’re right, you can’t “peer review” anything if you aren’t a peer.
I want to know who are these people who deny that climate changes. I daresay they are fewer, if any exist at all, than flat earthers.
Is that effort just for your local NF or is there some national program to do so for all of the NFs?
A very interesting article about this was posted here a couple of days ago. Here’s the article:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/07/a_sophomoric_look_at_climate_change.html
And here’s the FR link:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3764402/posts
“A 12-year span of time, starting on January 22, 2019 and ending on January 22, 2031, contains 4383 days.”
Any chance we can keep a daily tote board of how many days left or % of time already used?
[[(only 11.51 years left)]]
Well I guess these scientists better inform God that His plans for the 7 years of tribulation, and 1000 year reign of Christ won’t come to fruition- I bet God will be surprised to learn this
This one is just for our forest...the original plan was adopted in 1988 and, believe it or not, these management plans are revised...every 30-years or so.
There are other forest management plans around the western states currently in various stages of revision.
The original plan for our forest is a joke...the 10988 plan called for increasing grazing permits, (currently about 50% less than recommended) increasing road construction for logging access...a total joke...there is no, none, zero logging on our forest and there has not been a mile of road constructed in the past 10-years that I know of.
Thirty years ago there were 5-active sawmills within about 25-miles of our town...the last mill closed down in the early 1990’s.
The entire concept is just an appeasement process to convince everyone that the USFS is actively managing the forest. That is obviously a farce.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/blackhills/landmanagement/planning
“The Black Hills National Forest is governed by a management plan in accordance with the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) These plans set management, protection and use goals and guidelines.”
Are you saying ‘garbage in - garbage out’...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.