Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Then why was the age arbitrarily set at 26 for coverage under parents plans? Why not 30, if the goal is to increase to pool of healthy people?


61 posted on 07/11/2019 7:08:51 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

Most people by 26 are working and covered by their employers plans. People 18-26 are more likely to be either unemployed or in college without a healthcare plan.


70 posted on 07/11/2019 7:21:46 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

I suspect it was because they wanted to set the age at a point where college graduates would be included in the insurance pools even if they wanted to go to graduate school before they got their first “real” jobs.


79 posted on 07/11/2019 7:48:44 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson