Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AOC to face lawsuit over blocking Twitter users, following appeals court ruling on Trump
Fox ^ | 7-9-2019 | Greg Re, Ron Blitzer

Posted on 07/09/2019 12:43:49 PM PDT by tcrlaf

Former Democratic New York Assemblyman Dov Hikind told Fox News Tuesday that he is preparing to sue Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., for blocking users on Twitter based on their personal viewpoints, following a federal appeals court ruling barring President Trump from doing the same.

Asked where his lawsuit would be filed and whether other plaintiffs would be involved, Hikind told Fox News in an email, "All that’s being determined at the moment."

"Most likely we will be [the] only plaintiff, but [we will be] citing other examples," Hikind continued. "The claim is [the] same as [the] one against Trump. She uses that account for political/policy commentary, so to shut a citizen off from her statements is a problem -- as well as blocking me from petitioning her or seeking redress."

Fox News is told the lawsuit would likely focus on Ocasio-Cortez's popular and active @AOC account, which has more than 4.6 million followers. Ocasio-Cortez maintains a much smaller and rarely used official account, @RepAOC, with only 171,000 followers, but uses her personal @AOC account to discuss politics and engage with constituents and colleagues regularly.

For example, the top post pinned to Ocasio-Cortez's @AOC feed states, "A #GreenNewDeal is our plan for a world and a future worth fighting for." On July 5, she wrote to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, "Thank you, @SenSanders. It’s an honor to work alongside you and the millions of other people fighting for education, healthcare, and a living wage as rights."

Hikind added that in addition to himself, “several others, including journalists" have been barred from viewing Ocasio-Cortez's tweets

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: anotheraocthread; aoc; aoctwitter; hypocrosy; irony; ocasiocortez; publicforum; publisher; rentfree; rentfreeonfr; trumptwitter
Oh... The Irony.... I don't think the Judge thought this through, he basically declared that Twitter is a PUBLISHER, not a platform.
1 posted on 07/09/2019 12:43:49 PM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

(suspended) James Woods needs to go after the new public forum, Twitter, for obstructing his access to the POTUS


2 posted on 07/09/2019 12:50:56 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Yes. If Trump can't block people he disagrees with, Twitter can't block people they disagree with.

Twitter has been declared a public forum. Next will be Facebook and then YouTube.

The Liberals screwed themselves royally with this one! Hahahaha.

3 posted on 07/09/2019 12:59:00 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Today. and last year, a court decreed Twitter is a Public Forum.

This will result in many positive reactions for conservatives who have been discriminated against on Social Media Platforms.

4 posted on 07/09/2019 12:59:29 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Had not thought of that but it makes sense. They keep stepping in it.


5 posted on 07/09/2019 1:02:07 PM PDT by Anima Mundi (Breathes there a man with soul so dead...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

It’s beginning to look that way.


6 posted on 07/09/2019 1:17:02 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Here a question: Since the appeals court says that people cannot be blocked from commenting on Trump (or a public figures account), then does that prohibit the media company from suspending people, which prevents them from doing so. Seems like back door to provide 1st amendment protection to everyone. Thus, if Twitter blocked me, I wouldn’t be able to comment again on Trump’s tweets. Thoughts?


7 posted on 07/09/2019 1:27:01 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Maybe she’ll inadvertently establish a court precedent about censorship...aka, electronic book burning and will be used against FB, Twitter, Google.


8 posted on 07/09/2019 3:33:26 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Vote for President Trump in 2020 or end up equally miserable, no rights, and eating zoo animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
Oh... The Irony.... I don't think the Judge thought this through, he basically declared that Twitter is a PUBLISHER, not a platform.

My first thought when I heard about this is that congresscritters won't be happy about it in the long run.

9 posted on 07/09/2019 9:09:39 PM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson