It’s “reverent” to me vis a vis what Lodi was saying, being dismissive of the massive and extreme necessity of maintaining a GOP majority in the Senate, Mitt and Lisa and Susie included. A democrap Senate would have confirmed Garland (and dozens of very important lower court nominations that were also blocked). In my opinion McConnell’s heroism in blocking consideration of Garland ends any discussion of the matter of whether having a Senate majority is paramount or not, it is.
It’s “reverent” to me vis a vis what Lodi was saying, being dismissive of the massive and extreme necessity of maintaining a GOP majority in the Senate, Mitt and Lisa and Susie included. A democrap Senate would have confirmed Garland (and dozens of very important lower court nominations that were also blocked). In my opinion McConnell’s heroism in blocking consideration of Garland ends any discussion of the matter of whether having a Senate majority is paramount or not, it is.
Agree. How devastating would be it if we don’t get another GOP confirmed John Roberts clone on the court?
That’s the first time in my life I’ve seen “McConnell” and “heroism” in the same sentence. Sorry but the Garland beltway skirmish is a fart in the hurricane of 30 years of GOP support of the open borders agenda. Shortly you’ll get many SCOTUS judges much worse than Garland and you can thank the K Street Lobbyist/Chicom owned Mitch McConnell and the rest of the GOP for it. They have flat out lied to voters for 30 years about wanting a secure border and fair immigration system. All the while promoting the open borders agenda once elected.
Tucker has great piece detailing how the GOP donor class has utterly abandoned Main Street GOP voters. I suggest you check it out.