Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsi_junkie

“They are not intended for heavy seas. They are intended for operations close to shore, a.k.a. the littoral environment.“

Lucky thing the seas never get heavy near land.

L


13 posted on 07/03/2019 6:16:43 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker

Fair enough, I meant blue ocean operations. These are based on commercial transports as an experiment, get speed and sacrifice some other things so you can rapidly counter threats from small craft and the like. So yeah, they aren’t good in a hurricane or tropical storm.

They are kind of useless I think. They were created when we thought there was no fleet that could challenge us on the blue ocean so what we needed were fast ships that could sweep the coasts and ports for threats. Times change, China and Russia have bigger, more capable ships with more advanced weapons now so destroyers are more in vogue now. But we still have these.


14 posted on 07/03/2019 6:53:28 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Reminded me of one transit from Southern California to our homeport in Bremerton on Nimitz in 1988. Not far off the coast of Oregon I watched the inclinometer on the bridge hit 24 degrees.


17 posted on 07/03/2019 7:45:14 AM PDT by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson