Posted on 06/25/2019 11:05:49 AM PDT by detective
The official media account of how the intelligence community gained the transcript of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn talking to Ambassador Sergey Kisliyak on December 29th, 2016, surrounds incidental collection as a result of contact with an agent of a foreign power. Meaning the Flynn call was picked up as the U.S. intelligence apparatus was conducting surveillance on Russian Ambassador Kisliyak.
If this version of events were accurate (its not), it would fall under FISA-702 collection: the lawful monitoring of a foreign agent (Kislyak) who has contact with a U.S. person (Flynn).
In order to review the identity of the U.S. person, a process called unmasking, a 702 submission must be made. That submission, the unmasking, leaves a paper/electronic trail. In a 2017 congressional hearing, Senator Lindsey Graham asks Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and former DNI James Clapper about this process.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
First they fired General Flynn. Then they had him arrested. Next they tried to bankrupt him, prosecute his son and destroy him.
It is almost a miracle that General Flynn has survived the many attacks by Mueller and the Obama administration people.
Sundance has done some very good analysis here.
If you are following the transcripts of the Pre-Trial Hearings that General Flynn is undergoing right now, it is shocking that the Federal Judge in the case is being deliberately mislead by the Government and has no idea.
“First we [vulgar transitive verb of medieval origin meaning to copulate] Flynn...”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.