Posted on 06/21/2019 9:32:36 AM PDT by bitt
On CNN today, however, John King was critical of Nadler over the flub, saying, “He fought to get her testimony. He knows her name is Hope Hicks… If you’re gonna make the case to the American people that you’re making serious credible investigations and you’re prepared, why be amateur and offensive?”
Sadly..., that is but a rhetorical question today!
I’m sorry Mr. Nadless were you talking to me?
Sue him, Hicks. Once, and I don’t believe that for a second, could be a mistake. Three times is harassment. Go get ‘em.
the transcript sure reads like they are trying to catch her in a lie...otherwise, what’s the point ? their questions already have answers...
California is the same way. Get out to the metropolitan areas and it is mostly conservative.
He did that on purpose as a tactic to besmirch her.
I watched an ID show where the defense attorney pulled something like that against the dead victim and the courtroom was stunned by it but he did it on purpose to confuse them the jury.
The attorney was a snake he did not fool me neither does Nadler.
Fat-assed, horny Nadler called Hope Hicks “Mrs. Lewandowski” because he was hoping to get a mental “Lewinski” from her (in his dreams or with his hidden hand under his Chairman’s table).
He’s a douchebag, Jim.
Nadler is sexist!
He proved he is not qualified to chair a committee, and not qualified to remain in Congress.
when you subpoena a person and threaten her for weeks and weeks, then when she appears before you, you can't recall her name???
TOTALLY DISGUSTING...NADLER IS NOT WELL PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY..
I tweeted to call him some names over this - ended with calling him “Miss Lewinski” and told him to get off his knees and from in front of the rabid Right...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.