Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

“I would show them the utmost respect in person.

I’m not a fan of Stewart. I wouldn’t walk across the street to see him. He was right.”

Read the article.

Only 2 members scheduled to be there had other commitments.

The bill was passed unanimously the next day. There was no opposition.

Stewart was on a self serving, dishonest rant. Nothing he said was true.

Besides, why would Congress want to schedule a celebrity to testify about a multibillion dollar bill. Why not get someone who might have read the bill and might understand it. Not some self important clown to make up lies and grandstand for the cameras.


11 posted on 06/13/2019 1:08:40 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


It’s sad how the government didn’t acknowledge that the chemicals at Ground Zero caused this for years.


12 posted on 06/13/2019 1:12:07 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I don’t defend him being there.

He was there, and that’s fair game for criticism in it’s own right. I don’t care for celebrities being called into these things either.

If two people’s chairs were empty, then that’s two chairs too many.

Being in Congress is not just about casting decent votes. It’s also about showing recognition and support in person.


13 posted on 06/13/2019 1:12:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: detective

He made his high profile appeal. The bill passed. He will get the credit.

That’s how it always works.


14 posted on 06/13/2019 1:18:52 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson