I would posit none, for the simple reason that Trump isn’t a true, actual leader; that is, he isn’t a natural born killer.
There is nothing for Trump to lead. There is no opposition party to the progressive-corportist alliance. The open borders agenda firmly controls both wings of Uniparty and POTUS is playing a very weak hand trying to get bits of his MAGA platform enacted. The uniparty simply has no interest in following Trump’s lead. The GOP has thrown in with the Democrats to obstruct him. It’s that simple.
Au contraire - he has 50% of the country (militia) and maybe one-half military. So, why doesn't he act?
Consider Napoleon's 100 days. He simply boated away from Elba and began to walk towards Paris. Within 2 months, he was marching with an army, causing the French government to flee and allowing Napoleon to resume his (former) position as head of state. If Waterloo had turned out differently ...
Anyway, the point is that Trump, unlike Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, et al, is unwilling to launch a revolutionary war. Or, unlike Lincoln, the civil war, or unlike Wilson, WWI, or unlike Roosevelt, WWII. In other words, while Trump is an interesting, unique character, he doesn't really have "what it takes" to be a seminal, historical figure. And the reason for that is because he's actually risk averse and fundamentally non-violent.
Name a famous leader - male or female - at any point in time at any location on earth, and they all share one common characteristic: they are all willing to bet it all. Trump isn't, and that's all we need to know. As you said, the uniparty/deep state figured him out long ago. That's why they ignore him, taunt and belittle him, and basically just screw with him knowing that he will be gone in either 2 or 6 years.