Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Heck, until fairly recently, we did not even have a good target replica to test against. The navy knew they were in deep kim-chee in the 80's against the SSN-22 Sunburn.

The converted Talos AAW "Vandal" was limited both in number and target mimic capability.

The navy has not tested against a credible modern target. The current "Coyote" supersonic target is expensive and they likely do not want to shoot one down very often. "Simulations" are the current joy.

Reminds ne if the pre-WWII torpedoes that did not work, the navy not wanting to find out as they cost so much. Heck, when I was still in EW stuff, they ran tests against the AMRAAM where it was never launched, just telemetry collected to "project" real world performance.

Back when, they tested against "crossing" subsonic targets after an incoming (hit but still flying) BQM-74 center punched a ship and caused casualties. Unless things have changed, there are no realistic incoming missile target drills. Someone might get hurt...............

94 posted on 06/05/2019 9:49:50 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: doorgunner69

Well, I haven’t known those things, but the supersonic missiles flying in low was something I didn’t see as good.

I don’t serve in the armed forces, so I can’t say anything for sure.

My grandmother used to say, “An ounce of prevention, is worth a pound of cure.”

That makes sense to me here.

Thanks for the response.


98 posted on 06/05/2019 11:09:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson