To: be-baw
The tests were in 2017, and it took two years to determine the approximate size of the blast?
I don't believe it for a single minute. We knew within days.
8 posted on
06/03/2019 10:40:52 AM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Nuke all mooselimb terrorists, today.)
To: USS Alaska
I suspect hours or minutes.
Seismic stations should have been able to read the disturbance and armed with that information folks should have been able to make some pretty accurate determinations.
My thought is, why is this being lofted now? What goal does that serve?
16 posted on
06/03/2019 11:37:05 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
To: USS Alaska
I agree, it caused a 5.3, as I remember, and you don’t get that with firecrackers.
17 posted on
06/03/2019 12:45:33 PM PDT by
BobL
(I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
To: USS Alaska
If I remember right, the deep state line was to down play the potential size of the nukes. They even tried to state the early ones were not nukes. So it took 2 years to leak the truth from the Deep State.
21 posted on
06/03/2019 1:33:10 PM PDT by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
To: USS Alaska
Yes, of course we did, and who is surprised by this news?
Hiroshima was then. NorK/Iranian nukes are now.
23 posted on
06/03/2019 2:54:48 PM PDT by
OKSooner
(Shoot the coyotes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson