1 posted on
05/31/2019 7:24:16 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: All
Navy experts disagreed, saying the software was a law enforcement tool in a criminal investigation and was therefore legal. Not under these circumstances.
2 posted on
05/31/2019 7:32:36 AM PDT by
BipolarBob
(AOC is the Democrat prophecy come true : "A bartender will lead them".)
To: jazusamo
saying the software was a law enforcement tool in a criminal investigation and was therefore legal.
= = =
Yeah, and so is lying to the defendant during interrogation, etc.
‘A Law Enforcement Tool’, have to remember that.
3 posted on
05/31/2019 7:33:57 AM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(You know that I am full of /S)
To: Innovative; LeoWindhorse; E. Pluribus Unum; Olog-hai
4 posted on
05/31/2019 7:35:57 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
Sending the bug to the lawyers ought to be a hanging offense. We Americans have always thought that we were guaranteed privacy w/lawyers but the DS has turned that on its head.
5 posted on
05/31/2019 7:41:02 AM PDT by
tiki
To: jazusamo
According to court testimony, Cmdr. Chris Czaplak, the Navys lead prosecutor, sent tracking software in emails to the SEALs defense lawyers and to at least one reporter covering the case.
- -
Im not a legal expert, it Im guessing this is a criminal act on several levels.
To: jazusamo
I know this is a Military Tribunal, but they are still Judges. Why in the hell aren’t “Officers of the Court” Immediately Remanded and Criminally Charged for LYING and Committing FELONIES??
This is Rampant all across this Country and it should be an Automatic FELONY and Severe JAIL time for ANY Officer of the Court to LIE or CHEAT in any way.
8 posted on
05/31/2019 8:10:49 AM PDT by
eyeamok
MAGA!Support Free Republic, Folks! Donate Today!
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
11 posted on
05/31/2019 8:21:50 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
To: jazusamo
Gee....sounds like FBI tactics!
12 posted on
05/31/2019 8:24:03 AM PDT by
oil_dude
To: jazusamo
You want the truth?
YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!
But we can, cause we recorded your private attorney client conversation when you opened that email we sent you, which contained a bug/recording program!
Its for the good of the people, doncha know!!!
What happened to the rule of law?
13 posted on
05/31/2019 8:24:20 AM PDT by
9422WMR
To: jazusamo
Let this be a lesson to how leadership is adversely impacted by a corrupt regime. When crooks like Obozo head up government, the whole stink’n bureaucratic barrel of apples goes rotten to the bottom. In the legal area, it was with Holder's henchmen. They would go into court and lie their tails off to Federal judges and get away with it. Rot spreads quickly and it infected the military. Never forget what they did to Lt. Col. Terry Lakin and their stink’n rules of engagement, which basically set up every warrior for a Courts Martial. Yes, within the ranks there still are high level military officers and JAGS who subscribe to the Obozo motto, a corrupt end always justifies an anything goes means to achieve it. Rest assured the navy spying in the Gallagher case had to have been approved at much higher levels than at the trial level JAGs. The Pentagon and Navy IGs need to aggressively investigate and purge the military of these Obama holdovers who are saboteurs hiding in the ranks. In the military, it starts with the Lefts visceral hatred of the military. Just like the rot in our schools today, the anti-American infiltrators invaded the military ranks and are to this day trying to tear down our great military. I know it first hand. I have a close relative that is right now battling a false sex discrimination case. A climate brought on by forcing females to be placed in military operational specialties they can not handle and when they are unable to perform satisfactorily, use the hook of discrimination to ruin the rating officer's career. What makes it so treacherous is that in the military as it is in the civilian world, the woman's word (accusation) on all things 'sexual' ‘sexual’ now carries the day.
To: jazusamo
I am thinking that the UCMJ might require that if a search/siezure event was desired by military investigations on property or persons outside the military’s jurisdiction, that court cases have found a warrant from the pertinent (pertinent to where the action was to take place) civil court would be necessary, and if not obtained would amount to an illegal search/siezure. If the search/siezure was entirely within the physical and peron confines of a military jurisdiction, a warrant may not be needed. I think.
17 posted on
05/31/2019 9:25:37 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: jazusamo
18 posted on
05/31/2019 3:20:06 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it. --Douglas MacArthur)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson