Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Praises AOC on banning lawmakers from becoming lobbyists: I AGREE with her
Fox News ^ | May 30 2019 | Joseph A. Wolfsohn

Posted on 05/30/2019 5:33:14 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: CondoleezzaProtege

Something is definitely going on today.

I agreed with Elizabeth Warren and now Occasional Kotex all on one day. I think we’re being eaten up by a black or maybe we are being absorbed by a parallel universe. Scary stuff.

21 posted on 05/30/2019 6:38:08 PM PDT by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

Okay, that there was straight funny.


22 posted on 05/30/2019 6:40:39 PM PDT by LucienCA13 (sorry if you are microaggrieved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
Paul Ryan could not be reached for comment.
 
23 posted on 05/30/2019 6:42:36 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (September 11, 2001 : Never forget, never forgive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

More beltway flim flam here. The ex-Congresscritters will still be hired by lobbying firms but just won’t register as “lobbyists” . The new law should be no working or sitting on the board for any company that lobbies Fedgov. And no cut outs through trade associations, either.


24 posted on 05/30/2019 6:43:47 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Democrats will quietly straighten Mz. Cow Fartz out.
She will claim this was just ‘dry humor’ that only her contraceptive sponge would fail to get.


25 posted on 05/30/2019 6:43:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

I agree.


26 posted on 05/30/2019 6:46:20 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

I suspect that her term limit is up in 2020. NYC is still ticked off at her Amazon stunt.


27 posted on 05/30/2019 6:49:46 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (what a mess we got ourselves into)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

An asinine idea.

Term limits much better.


28 posted on 05/30/2019 6:52:46 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux

In his somewhat defense, he was a commoner and remained one - at least in spirit and attitude, so him ‘wanting’ it was probably for humane reasons rather than trying to garner all the votes he could...

What people don’t ‘realize’ about PDJT he showed the RINOs up for the phonies they were and -as a lot- the whole bunch of them caved on the BOScare even though they ran on it. Of course some quit but others with the job for life attitude just blew off their constituents.

PDJT is a danger to ALL pols... Like Rush tried to explain today, YOU go through everyone taking shots at you for 2 years, lies in general knowing you did nothing wrong yet they kept and keep pushing.

Who wouldn’t treat his ‘enemies’ like enemies?


29 posted on 05/30/2019 6:53:02 PM PDT by xrmusn (6/98"HRC is cast as the Grandmother that lures Hansel & Gretel to the pot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton
It could be. The Sun will not rise and the day will be dark as sack cloth. The stars will not shine in the heavens And the lion will lie down with the lamb(you know the lambs aren't going to be getting any sleep that night!)Dogs and cats will cohabitate.
30 posted on 05/30/2019 7:05:07 PM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

His first few days in office, didn’t Trump sign an XO banning all government officials from taking jobs with lobbyist groups for 5 years?

I know I saw him sign it, I was surprised it happened in only a few days. Figured he already had it typed up and ready to go...

Maybe I misunderstood what it actually said? Or Cruz is just jumping on a chance to make it law, and long term?

A good write up here, I still don’t understand half of it, but I’ll read it a few times and maybe...

https://www.hklaw.com/politicallawblog/president-trumps-executive-order-implements-campaign-lobbying-pledge-01-31-2017/


31 posted on 05/30/2019 7:27:07 PM PDT by Paleo Pete (It's not a toe, it's a furniture location device!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Good for them.


32 posted on 05/30/2019 7:53:46 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Cruz is an IDIOT for giving her cred about this topic.

I don’t know who was first, but it CERTAINLY WAS NOT AOC.

https://www.vox.com/2015/4/17/8443977/congress-lobbying-ban


33 posted on 05/30/2019 8:11:40 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Isn’t that something Trump often mentioned during the campaign? Or it was that there had to be a period of several years before making the transition.


34 posted on 05/30/2019 8:36:13 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege; shanover; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; justiceseeker93

What part of the Constitution grants the government the power to tell ANYBODY they aren’t “allowed” to be a lobbyist? Lobbying is literally speech.


35 posted on 05/31/2019 6:21:57 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege; shanover; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; justiceseeker93; ...

And I fail to see the utility of working with AOC on anything. Her utility to us is using her as a bogeyman to raise money and scare voters in swing districts. Working with her undermines that.


36 posted on 05/31/2019 6:24:58 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Cruz just rolled AOC if this bill passes. This is a DREAM conservative bill come true!! Let’s be blunt: The only credit AOC will get will come from the conservative/libertarian wing of the Republican Party. I would be TICKLED PINK to see this pill pass, and I will FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE the “BRILLIANCE” of AOC!

Unfortunately, I think that some Dem is going to get to AOC and explain how such a bill would essentially torpedo 90% of any influence their former members would have, not to mention hamper the Deep State GOP who have traditionally played interference for the globalist commie Dems.


37 posted on 05/31/2019 2:43:32 PM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Not when it uses the power of providing financial incentives to influence legislation. There is indeed a fine line between first amendment and illicit influence, but Ted Cruz eloquently explained the difference in how pragmatically lobbyists have breached the barriers between petitioning (legal) and colluding (very illegal). I have to dig up that speech, but I trust Cruz on the constitution far more than 99% of the population.


38 posted on 05/31/2019 2:50:17 PM PDT by GOP Congress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

[[Are these signs of the end times?]]

Nah- the twilight zone


39 posted on 05/31/2019 11:29:15 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; LS; DarthVader

On the surface, I can agree with this too. Why not?

But it gives cover to Occasionally Coherant.


40 posted on 06/01/2019 2:26:15 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson