Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Zuckerberg to face vote calling for him to stand down and to hire a new board chair [tr]
UK Daily Mail ^ | May 30, 2019 | Ian Randall

Posted on 05/30/2019 8:02:48 AM PDT by C19fan

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is facing a vote calling for him to stand down at the firm's annual shareholder meeting, being held today.

It comes after calls for the CEO to stand down as chairman of the board and appoint a new successor.

The move is unlikely to pass without Zuckerberg's agreement, however, as he controls 58 per cent of the vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: corporate; facebook
I got a big chuckle out of all these investment management types with their MBAs from fancy schools complaining about Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg when he brought Facebook public ensured he would have dictatorial control as the article stated by controlling special shares. All these investors bought Facebook stock knowing they would have zero say in how Facebook is run. Embrace the suck Facebook investors.
1 posted on 05/30/2019 8:02:48 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yeah if they bought shares at 20 bucks 7 years ago they’ve only made 900 percent profit :)

I’d embrace that suck.:)

Twitter is another story...


2 posted on 05/30/2019 8:06:38 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Liberals investing capitalist money in an ultra-liberal company hoping to become filthy rich capitalists so they can pretend to care about the ordinary folk.


3 posted on 05/30/2019 8:07:49 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Islam, not a religion, a totalitarian political ideology aiming for world domination. -Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

A lot of hand wringing goes on about the influence Facebook has on people’s behavior and politics. I think a lot of us tried it and got burned out quickly. 10 years from now Facebook will probably be something kids won’t even know about.


4 posted on 05/30/2019 8:11:13 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

5 posted on 05/30/2019 8:11:36 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Well said I think that’s part of what’s going on here.

Virtue signaling by owning Facebook?

I never understand how companies like Facebook or Uber have any market value. They don’t seem to have any tangible Assets in their business. Of course I understand the stock has value if there are willing buyers and sellers. If I owned such stick, I would worry that the bottom will fall out of their business eventually.


6 posted on 05/30/2019 8:14:28 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Gotta love the irony, of the board trying to get rid of the guy who started the company.


7 posted on 05/30/2019 8:16:12 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"Gotta love the irony, of the board trying to get rid of the guy who started the company"

They did the same thing to Steve Jobs. Apple tanked shortly after and they had to purchase Next Computer years later to get him back.

8 posted on 05/30/2019 8:20:50 AM PDT by caltaxed (ake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Hey, let’s all go over to MySpace and talk about it.


9 posted on 05/30/2019 8:26:58 AM PDT by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
I thought FB to be a flash in the pan when it was released at $35 (?) a share. I bought when it plummeted to 19.

I then sold when he reached $30.

No wonder I am still working!

10 posted on 05/30/2019 8:35:02 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (California: knowingly give someone aids: misdemeanor. Give them a straw, go to jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Lol

I bought Apple PRE SPLIT at 18.

Heard some nonsense on CNBC and sold it

It o ly went up about 5,000 percent.

I bought 20k worth.

What would I have done with an extra million anyway?

I would miss my side job running around like an 18 year old :)

It is what it is as pop would have said.


11 posted on 05/30/2019 8:38:59 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Down with $500 T-shirt guy!


12 posted on 05/30/2019 8:47:02 AM PDT by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Facebook is a treasure trove of information and spying for the intelligence agencies; and people voluntarily provide their info. ANy coincidence Lifelog was shut down the day Facebook went live?


13 posted on 05/30/2019 9:00:54 AM PDT by afterhoursarmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

It should be against the law for an inventor of a company to be voted out of his own company. That is some nasty nonsense the United States allows. Trump should do an immediate EO and stop this.


14 posted on 05/30/2019 9:09:37 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

You wrote: “It should be against the law for an inventor of a company to be voted out of his own company. That is some nasty nonsense the United States allows. Trump should do an immediate EO and stop this.”

I certainly hope that Mr. Trump does not do that. I don’t think he would even consider it for a second.

If the majority of the shareholders don’t want the inventor/founder of the company to run the company, it is their decision. If it is a bad decision, the shareholders will pay for it. After all, they put up the money, they own the company, they own the patents.

If an inventor does not want to lose control of his company, he should not take it public and if he does, he needs to retain ownership of a majority share of stocks to retain control. Of course, the decision not to take a stock public, might ultimately end up in the failure of the business, and the inventor ending up a poor man instead of a rich one.

On the other hand, if his invention has created a huge industry, it may be extremely profitable give up control of his massive company.

Besides which, if Pres. Trump did issue such an EO, the courts would never go along with it. And I think congress, which is heavily influenced by big money, would quickly pass legislation against it. In this case, it would be good legislation.

Don’t forget too, such an EO would destroy the ability of the inventor/founder to raise the capital he needs, and that could hurt economy immeasurably. Big industry needs big capital!


15 posted on 05/30/2019 11:57:17 AM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

I guess it’s hard for me to wrap my head around someone losing the business they started.


16 posted on 05/30/2019 1:20:03 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

once he went public he gave up actual ownership ...


17 posted on 05/30/2019 1:26:12 PM PDT by bankwalker (Immigration without assimilation is an invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson