It makes no difference what Mueller says. The Democrats will use it to convince the gullible that 2 + 2 = 5.
Mulehead: “The report is the report. No more, no less. Bug off.”
Mueller trying to control the narrative on why he will not testify publicly. Maybe Nadler threatened him with a subpoena. Or Mueller is going political and will say that he didn’t make a decision on obstruction charges because DOJ rules say you can’t indict a sitting President.
It will be interesting to see if he touches the subject of declassification by the AG on the origins of Trump collusion. Will he side with Brennan, Clapper, and Comey and warn against revealing this material?
The IG report will be coming out soon. Is this what prompted this appearance today? We’ll know soon enough.
That gives him an Hour to attack POTUS Trump before Rush’s Show starts.
Maybe he had a Road-To-Damascus moment, and will spill his guts and tell the truth.
(Nah...)
Whatever he’s doing he’s doing it from the DOJ.
Look for something really $hitty... He sure isn’t going to do the republicans any favors.... :(
Drudge is excited about it!
Everything’s heating up... pressure is building on the corrupt liberal Establishment. This could get interesting.
Maybe this has something to do with Roger Stone.
'It's pointless for Democrats to ask me to testify because I won't say anything more than what's in my final report.'
No questions were allowed...
Muellers goal from day one to today, is to screw our President. Hate has no limits.
Stir up the divide and cause trouble for a long time.
Mr Barr.. get the docs out!
He said little other than he wasted $35mil investigating a crime that he couldn’t send forward for prosecution! No questions?? What the hell? He worked for us, not himself? I would ask two simple questions, “Why was this investigation into the 2016 election focused only on the GOP side?”. and, “When did you conclude that no collusion occurred with the Trump campaign?”
Just finished watching it on FOX. It was very interesting in he basically cut off the congressional investigation and shut down Nadler and his merry men.
By stating the original investigation was established to determine Russian interference in the 2016 election, he limited the span of it. Having people lie about their interests in the election doesn’t qualify a crime. Anyone can say anything if it is not slander. And none of it was. Misleading is a product of politics and both sides do it already.
By saying the investigation was also into the Trump campaign for colluding with the Russians and finding no evidence, closes that part out. He further stated that the there was not enough evidence, meaning none as any would have been enough, that Trump or his campaign obstructed the justice department work. This was previously verified by Barr.
Mueller also stated that since there isn’t a crime that can reach a court resolution because what the liberals were after cannot be one for a sitting president, then there is no crime. (Besides there being no evidence)
If that’s the case, then what is Nadler’s committee doing? Simple, voter unrest. Make the voters uncomfortable so they will vote Trump out in 2020. And that’s all. Trump can have a field day on this. And there is now a question on whether Nadler’s committee can subpoena anyone to testify for a non-existent crime of any nature without committing slander/liable with the inference that their committee is there to investigate something that doesn’t exist as there is no evidence of it and no way to prosecute it if there actually was.
What goes around......
rwood