Even a neutral would posit that to claim a cover-up is, by definition, to claim that there is an underlying crime.
Logically, this would also mean that the person making the claim of a cover-up would know the general or specific nature of the underlying crime.
Clearly, this is not the case with Pelosi since:
a) The investigation she and her cronies were breathlessly awaiting turned out to be a cosmic void.
b) She can’t or won’t describe what additional crimes, if any, are being ‘covered up.’
She has nothing. They have nothing. They’re running out of ways to say nothing and to issue empty threats.
Innuendos and allegations without any corroborating evidence — that is what the Dems/Libs/Media do.
No crime. Doesn’t matter. They just make stuff up. Scorched earth and the politics of personal destruction.
It's like Adam Shifty says, They need to impeach to have a mechanism to search for something to impeach the President for...
Great!!! Pointless to talk with fools and liars...