[TXnMA]

"The first one, which was as hotly anticipated as this one, was a highly redacted coverup."

"Hmmm....I thought it was a dud and this confirms it. Two for two?Hmmm....I thought it was a dud and this confirms it. Two for two?

~~~~~~

Two absurdly wrong, defeatist conclusions -- together -- prove nothing.

[hardspunned]

OK, you explain the “no bias” by Comey, Strzok and crew to me. You’re happy with that ruling? The lie manufactued by Horowitz, “no bias”, kept the witch hunt going. Had he published the truth, which he obviously knew, this sham investigation could have been derailed a year ago. Horowitz is just as complicit as Rosenstein and Wray in turning a blind eye to an ongoing coup. You like the democrat chaircreatures in the house? By whitewashing the FBI/Clinton scandal Horowitz bears partial responsibilty for the torpedoing of Trump’s agenda last summer and fall and the loss of the house.
Defeatist, huh? Let me hear you’re winning take on the first Horowitz report. Cite some real examples, not “part of the plan” foolishness.

[JonPreston]

Spoken like someone with a deep trust for government.