Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
the "consumer" in the U.S. is almost always a manufacturer, not an end user.

Oh really? Who ultimately pays for the increase in steel to the auto industry? You think that Ford just absorbs the added cost to their product as a good will gesture to their customers?

17 posted on 05/17/2019 2:30:32 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (uizzzp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco
Sorry, I wasn’t clear ...

Imposing tariffs on raw materials without having any tariffs on finished products makes the U.S. manufacturer less competitive in a global market. Ford is a perfect example. Imposing a tariff on Canadian steel gives the company a big incentive to avoid the tariff by simply producing cars in Canada instead of the U.S. The raw steel has a tariff on it, while the steel in the car does not.

18 posted on 05/17/2019 2:50:00 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson