Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. will begin collecting data for pay equity analysis
TechTarget ^ | 8 May 2019 | Patrick Thibodeau

Posted on 05/14/2019 3:53:19 PM PDT by spintreebob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
No mention of consultants/contractors, just employees. Minority consulting firms are mostly under 100 employees. They typically have a better quality and higher pay rate than employees. Minority consulting firms and minority employees with high rates will be attracted to the big firms to make their numbers.

White highly paid white employees will be let go and brought in as contractors/consultants.

Everyone will game the system. The EEOC and especially the IRS will realize they are being played and take action to get revenge and teach business a lesson of who is in control. The IRS will make the life of those who can't fight back, those not skilled at playing the game.

Employment and Consulting will not be based on qualifications, but on irrelevant business but very relevant regulatory considerations.

1 posted on 05/14/2019 3:53:19 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Pay is not equal. Everyone is paid by ability except Jennifer at WKRP in Cincinnati who is paid for looking good..... : )


2 posted on 05/14/2019 3:57:14 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

[Former President Barack Obama’s administration approved the pay equity analysis data collection. It was reversed by Trump in 2017, with little explanation. The National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) filed a lawsuit in response.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan recently ruled in favor of the NWLC, disagreeing with the Trump administration and its argument that the pay equity analysis data collection will have “disruptive consequences.” ]


An Obama judge strikes again. EO’s for Democrats, but not for Republicans. I hope Trump is appealing this.


3 posted on 05/14/2019 3:58:40 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Isn’t covered in the U.S. Constitution, yet is covered as a communist talking point.


4 posted on 05/14/2019 3:58:59 PM PDT by AmericanCheeseFood (Fox Shadowbans People On Comments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

If any doesn’t believe in the deep state, here it is.


5 posted on 05/14/2019 3:59:12 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Recommended
‘The Upside of Inequality” by Edward Conrad


6 posted on 05/14/2019 4:00:10 PM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

The pay equity analysis which will be later law because this is what is important not ability and work ethic, this will be bastardized and manipulated to favor those who are WHAT they are rather than WHO they are. All roads lead to race and gender. blacks, browns and women, white men are the target who will pay the price for being the bread winner


7 posted on 05/14/2019 4:13:41 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (nicdip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

So more meaningless data will be collected, and used by liberals to allegedly prove there is discrimination.

For example, we all know the vast majority of secretarial/clerical workers are women. And we know the vast majority of construction workers are men. And we know that the majority of construction workers make far more than the secretarial or clerical workers. So where exactly is there sex discrimination in this example?

The vast majority of partners in law firms are men, yet there are huge numbers of women attorneys. The higher compensation of the law partners will skew the average pay of male attorneys to be higher than females. But that difference would not be due to discrimination.


8 posted on 05/14/2019 4:14:45 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
Unbelievably intrusive, it's a real abomination obamination.

President Trump should cancel this fiasco. It will result in a can of worms subject to agenda driven interpretations. The end result will be lower quality workforce, and higher costs to business, and worst of all, more racial and class hatred/division. Bureaucracy at its worst.
 

9 posted on 05/14/2019 4:14:51 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
President Donald Trump's administration failed to block this collection in federal court, clearing the path for this action.

10 posted on 05/14/2019 4:19:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
What a suprise!

JUDGE CHUTKAN


11 posted on 05/14/2019 4:21:22 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Are they going to interview every single woman who walks high voltage power lines during blizzards in Maine during January or just a few of them?


12 posted on 05/14/2019 4:23:40 PM PDT by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

None of the government’s business. Companies should refuse to comply. Trump should refuse to enforce.


13 posted on 05/14/2019 4:32:21 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Just like Obama’s school policy that decreed schools had to discipline just as many white students as black student to achieve balance in school discipline regardless of who was actually causing problems.


14 posted on 05/14/2019 4:42:19 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan recently ruled in favor of the NWLC, disagreeing with the Trump administration and its argument that the pay equity analysis data collection will have "disruptive consequences."

This product of affirmative action is the same activist judge who forced the Office of Refugee Resettlement to allow abortions and who let the Awan brothers off the hook. She's from David Boies's law firm, and her husband Peter Arno Krauthamer is another Obama judge.

15 posted on 05/14/2019 4:42:24 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Man that judge has a chip on her racist shoulder a mile long.
She just reeks hatred. If looks could kill, every white person would be dead.


16 posted on 05/14/2019 4:47:34 PM PDT by redshawk (0pansy is a Liar and Hates.........he just hates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

It is another way to sow discord and destroy the Country from the inside.


17 posted on 05/14/2019 4:51:58 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

“regardless of who was actually causing problems.”

Sheere insanity, but not a surprise.


18 posted on 05/14/2019 4:59:12 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

A big step forward for State Socialism.


19 posted on 05/14/2019 5:07:49 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Excellent analysis.

If you’re skilled, talented and motivated to succeed don’t be an employee at a large firm, government agency or organization. Be a contractor. You’re better off in so many ways.


20 posted on 05/14/2019 5:11:22 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson