Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In China, Some Fear the End of ‘Chimerica’
New York Times ^ | May 14, 2019 | Li Yuan

Posted on 05/14/2019 3:29:18 PM PDT by Zhang Fei

Wu Shichun is one of countless Chinese entrepreneurs who over the past four decades have prospered from access to American customers and money.

Today, as the American government threatens to take that away, the serial entrepreneur and venture capital investor is fundamentally rethinking how he does business.

One of his portfolio companies designs and makes fashion products in China, then sells to American consumers on Amazon.com. Another, a vape device maker, sells most of its products in the United States. The third, which makes metal materials for electronic manufacturers, exports 40 percent of its production there. All three would be hit by new American tariffs.

“From now on I’ll have to invest in companies that focus on the Chinese market,” said Mr. Wu, 42.

“I hope China and the U.S. can find a better way to coexist,” he said. “It doesn’t have to be mutually destructive.”

The Chinese government has struck a defiant tone since President Trump ratcheted up the trade war on Friday by raising tariffs on Chinese exports worth $200 billion a year. “If the U.S. wants to talk, our door is open,” said a commentary on state-controlled China Central Television on Monday night that quickly went viral. “If the U.S. wants to fight, we’ll be with them till the end.”

Many entrepreneurs and intellectuals, by contrast, are hoping for a deal. China’s rise out of the stark terror of the Cultural Revolution was fueled in part from connections to the United States, an early diplomatic partner that offered investment, markets and opportunity. There’s even a word going around the Chinese internet for the tight economic bonds that have formed between the world’s two largest economies: “Chimerica.”

The trade war is taking direct aim at Chimerica. New tariffs, if they stick, threaten to cut off a big market

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boycotts; china; maga; sanctions; tariffs; trade; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The Chinese economy seems to have veered away from Marxist-Leninist Party cadre-dictated plans that dictated every aspect of economic life towards that of an earlier era. Back when China was ruled by de jure absolute monarchs, it had large state monopolies in what the sovereign considered strategic industries, combined with fairly laissez faire policies in non-strategic sectors. A good chunk of the Party's problem with the concessions demanded by the President is that they reduce the Party's links to the economic source of its overweening power over the Chinese state. Just as the PLA is the Party's army rather than China's army, Chinese state-owned firms belong to the Party rather than China. That is why this tariff issue could escalate before it simmers down - what is being demanded strikes at the heart of the Party's power - its finances. Note also that the Venezuelan population has endured significant privation for well over a decade without a coup attempt during Chavez's or Maduro's respective reigns. It would not be surprising if Xi Jinping rides this trade dispute out unsinged.

At any rate, it's probably a good idea to uncouple from China's economy to prepare for the military campaigns to come, if history is any guide. Every single new Chinese dynasty has, once it swept away internal opponents* and fought off external enemies fishing in troubled waters, engaged in attempts to expand China's boundaries. China's economy isn't quite as dominant as it was relative to its neighbors before Industrial Age Europeans first showed up in numbers at its ports. But at # 2 in the world, and about the same size as all of its neighbors, combined, it's big enough to allow the Chinese state to throw its weight around. And it's starting to do that in the Western Pacific. So we need to get ready for the PLA's grand tour of the Pacific, which might give the Imperial Japanese Army's version a run for its money. And then some.

* These internal opponents would include military commanders who felt they were given too small a share of the spoils of the war that brought the new dynasty to power, remnants of the ancien regime looking to restore the previous dynasty's rule or rival rebel groups that thought they might have a chance at the throne before the new dynasty was able to consolidate its power.

1 posted on 05/14/2019 3:29:18 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

China, you chose poorly


2 posted on 05/14/2019 3:31:49 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

once USA gets a fair and balanced trade going with China, the sky’s the limit! for Chinese manufacturers as well as Americans


3 posted on 05/14/2019 3:50:13 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Mr. Wu, embrace the suck.


4 posted on 05/14/2019 3:50:26 PM PDT by onona (It is often wise to allow a person a graceful path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oscar in Batangas

or...…...newer version of Rice Paper Fail?


5 posted on 05/14/2019 4:04:42 PM PDT by EnglishOnly (eWFight all out to win OR get out now. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I’ve read that China’s current economic & governing system is what the Kuomintang would have had if they had won the civil war.


6 posted on 05/14/2019 4:08:32 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

You see what Nixon started?


7 posted on 05/14/2019 4:14:10 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
The Chimera was slain by Bellerophon, who rode the winged horse Pegasus.

Chimerica will be slain by Trump riding his figurative horse, Deplorabus.

8 posted on 05/14/2019 4:14:27 PM PDT by rfp1234 (I don't watch CNN for the same reason I don't drink from the toilet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

“I hope China and the U.S. can find a better way to coexist”

That’s what Mr. Trump is doing. But not getting the cooperation he deserves.


9 posted on 05/14/2019 4:15:44 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

“is what the Kuomintang would have had if they had won the civil war”

Now THAT is a really good point!


10 posted on 05/14/2019 4:16:35 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oscar in Batangas
"Today, as the American government threatens to take that away level the playing field..
"“I hope China and the U.S. can find a better way to coexist,” he said. “It doesn’t have to be mutually self destructive.”"

Image result for wambulance caricature animated

11 posted on 05/14/2019 4:16:57 PM PDT by chief lee runamok (expect nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

China uses slave labor in many factories. Why do we need cheap Chinese crap again?


12 posted on 05/14/2019 4:17:12 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Love no longer trumps hate with liberals. Open hatred is now the new virtue signalling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

If I remember the book correctly it’s “Generalissimo: Chang Kai-Shek”. Fascinating book!


13 posted on 05/14/2019 4:25:43 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reily

[I’ve read that China’s current economic & governing system is what the Kuomintang would have had if they had won the civil war.]


I’d say a more repressive version, since the Nationalist Party did not have gulags. The Communist takeover of China had a silver lining. It brought China to its knees for a couple of generations. It killed perhaps 5-10% of the Chinese population through cockamamie economic schemes, even nuttier than bog-standard Marxism-Leninism, that resulted in widespread famine. A Nationalist-ruled China would probably have gotten China’s economy going a lot earlier, which would have given it the ability to start throwing its weight around in the Far East starting perhaps in the 70’s.

I’m inclined towards the Kremlinologist Richard Pipes’s view that the issue with the Soviet Union wasn’t that it was Communist, but that it was Russian. By that, he mean that the regime shared the Russian tendency, established once Dmitri Donskoi broke out from under the grip of Mongol vassalage, towards universal empire (much like the Mongols themselves). And Mongol ambitions may themselves be derived from the Chinese sovereign’s claim to rule “all under heaven”, because in the Chinese way of thinking, universal peace is achievable only under universal empire (a theme in the chop socky movie “Hero” featuring Jet Li).

In other words, we’d have had trouble with the Chinese whether the Nationalists or the Communists were in charge. At least with the Communists, we got a 40-year reprieve.


14 posted on 05/14/2019 4:27:18 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reily

[If I remember the book correctly it’s “Generalissimo: Chang Kai-Shek”. Fascinating book!]


By Jay Taylor, who also wrote a book about Chiang’s son.


15 posted on 05/14/2019 4:31:01 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Now I’m going to have to dig it out!


16 posted on 05/14/2019 4:32:10 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Interesting stuff. Thanx.


17 posted on 05/14/2019 4:37:08 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

“Today, as the American government threatens to take that away...”

NO ONE is threatening to take ANYTHING away; President Trump is merely leveling the playing field.


18 posted on 05/14/2019 5:10:28 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

The Chinese business people have had it too easy for too long. The party had to end one day. Today is that day with more pain to come very likely. It’s the pain of an even playing field where they have to actually work and compete normally; something many of them have never experienced except with each other; not us “stupid” Americans.


19 posted on 05/14/2019 5:31:41 PM PDT by Boomer (One can be an American or a Democrat but never both; not since Zero was elected anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

China is building roads and bridges and everything that goes next to roads on a massive scale. Big buildings, cities, etc.

Like others like the Saudi’s they have become used to a certain rate of cash flow. They have bet the farm on that run rate and cannot hold up to a big dip in the revenue stream.

Unlike 99.9% of Washington Trump understands money.

Trump is a genius.

At some point the federal government is going to experience what China is going through. Shrinkage, and not the George Costanza kind.

3 years ago I would never have thought I would have seen the things I have seen recently. God is in the house.


20 posted on 05/14/2019 6:01:12 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Say what you will about The Donald, but he has all the right enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson