Posted on 05/12/2019 8:06:10 PM PDT by bitt
Roger Stone is requesting proof that the Russians hacked tehe DNC server, as was reported in the Mueller report. He claims if the Russians didn’t hack the DNC, his case should be dismissed. The problem for the Mueller team is that they and the FBI have never reportedly actually looked at the server.
Roger Stone and his legal team are requesting the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks.
...
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
This is a great move by Stone.
He is probably going to be overruled by the ultra-hack judge in charge of this case, but Stone is right on the money.
My sense is that the judge will overrule, but that it will be appeal-able as a matter of law. He’s being denied access to exonerating evidence. And the investigation is faulty for not having seen the evidence but relies on the results reported by an adversary of the Trump team.
Agreed.
William Binney is the former Technical Director of the NSA, and Larry Johnson is a former CIA counterterrorism analyst.
Binney and Johnson found that almost all of the emails published by Wikileaks have what’s called a FAT file marker on them. A FAT file transfer system puts a “time stamp” on documents or emails, and the FAT system automatically rounds that time stamp up to the nearest even number: 2, 4, 6, 8 or 0. About 35,813 of the total 44,053 DNC emails published by Wikileaks have a FAT marker on them.
The DNC emails published by Wikileaks were transferred at 49.1 megabytes per second, from unknown point A to unknown point B. (If the DNC had allowed the FBI to analyze its servers after it was “hacked,” there would be no “unknowns” – we would know exactly when, where and how the emails were transferred off of that server.) Yet the fastest speed that you can transfer data from New Jersey to anywhere in Europe – including Russia – is only 12 megabytes per second. So, the 49.1 megabytes-per-second transfer speed on the emails is very telling. Why? Because there is one way to transfer data that fast. In fact, that’s the exact speed that data travels when you load it onto… a thumb drive.
That thumb drive then made its way to Wikileaks and the emails ended up on the internet. A defense attorney would have a field day with that information if Robert Mueller tried to prosecute one of the Russians he’s accused of “remotely hacking” the DNC servers. Conclusion the Trump campaign couldn’t have colluded with the Russians to hack the DNC emails. Because the DNC was never hacked
Good post. Meanwhile, however, Barr and the GOP are pretty much agreeing with the Mueller report. I consider that a tactical move to deny the Trump half of the old Trump-Russia hoax, at the cost of supporting the preposterous Clapper-Brennan-Crowdstrike story about the “17 agencies.”
But leftards and MSM sock puppets keep saying it, so it must be true./s
Great post.
Now if a Grand Jury is ever appointed, your post might be considered as evidence.
Okay by me———there’s more where that came from.
You can post it. I just wanted to link the previous comments.
One of the signs in your pictures reminded me of Tim Kaine - Hillary’s running mate. The most invisible, most forgettable VP candidate in history.
Finally! Someone with 'standing' who can force this issue. I have posted often that the FBI is vulnerable on this matter.
We missed you Pepe.
Long time no hear.
Nice photo.
I think the clown version of Pepe is called “The Honkler.” He is a racist because he makes fun of leftist buffoons and NPCs.
I saw Senator Kaine at Old Dominion University’s graduation last Saturday. I was working the event and he came through my door. We greeted one another, I so wanted to yell out, No collusion ! How’s Hillary these days ?
More than William Miller?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.